Dthom wrote: Carney avoids talking about starting stats or percentage gains . Interestingly many studies do use percentage gains as a measure , which , rightly , is probably the best way to look at it .
From a marketing perselpective , of course , you don't want to tell someone that if they're shorter that they will probably have less absolute gains than someone who is longer . The key word is probably ...
So your actual argument is that there is a
marketing conspiracy so as to not detract shorter men from getting the procedure? I'm sure you didn't mean to say it that way, it's just how it came off lol.
You do realize that men who are shorter are more qualified for the procedure to begin with, and a 1-
Inch gain for a smaller man is a greater percentage-yield than a 1-
Inch gain for a longer man?
If you wish to disagree, I will respect that but as I mentioned before, let's resume the topic at hand, thanks.