TOPIC: Interesting Filler Comparison Chart

Apparently PMMA irregularities are said to be \"common\" and sessions have become limited to 2 main ones only (or at least that is what is recommended, and I have to say I agree strongly). I\'m surprised irregularities are common though. It didn\'t seem like that in the early logs on this board.



www.drcasavantes.com/girth-enhancement/products/

I still feel the term \'reversible\' is used incorrectly. Only HA is reversible ie if you want/need it gone there is a way to do that now. The others are more correct to call temporary.

Restoration wrote: Apparently PMMA irregularities are said to be \"common\" and sessions have become limited to 2 main ones only (or at least that is what is recommended, and I have to say I agree strongly). I\'m surprised irregularities are common though. It didn\'t seem like that in the early logs on this board.



www.drcasavantes.com/girth-enhancement/products/

That\'s true...There were very few irregularities in the first year of Phalloboards members going to Dr. C

I think Dr C started out doing PMMA in conservative amounts and when his clientele built up, he got pressured into maximizing gains resulting increase in complications.

Yeah, Dr. Oates, I agree. I think they mean \"it goes away\" really. Speaking of those two fillers, do you think you\'d get as good results with Radiesse in the penis as you have gotten with voluma? Is there any main reason you like one over the other?

I thought that Radiesse would encourage more human cells to keep the CaHa in place, wheras voluma just sits wherever it wants & can move at will - but I suspect I am wrong about this. If you\'ve answered this elsewhere, sorry about that. My penis looks like a piece of beef jerky after all the procedures I have gone through after my round 3 PMMA mess, so I sort of hope one day I can do something very minor and conservative (like HA or Radiesse) just to improve it a little from its current appearance. I did use Radiesse in the past, after round 3, to camouflage nodules. It looked great, but the effects were gone quite fast (6 mos max, I think). I did not use very much. It was really more of an experiment.

Restoration wrote: Yeah, Dr. Oates, I agree. I think they mean \"it goes away\" really. Speaking of those two fillers, do you think you\'d get as good results with Radiesse in the penis as you have gotten with voluma? Is there any main reason you like one over the other?

I have never really used Radiesse - did not seem to have a great advantage

I thought that Radiesse would encourage more human cells to keep the CaHa in place, wheras voluma just sits wherever it wants & can move at will - but I suspect I am wrong about this.

Voluma does not move.


If you\'ve answered this elsewhere, sorry about that. My penis looks like a piece of beef jerky after all the procedures I have gone through after my round 3 PMMA mess, so I sort of hope one day I can do something very minor and conservative (like HA or Radiesse) just to improve it a little from its current appearance. I did use Radiesse in the past, after round 3, to camouflage nodules. It looked great, but the effects were gone quite fast (6 mos max, I think). I did not use very much. It was really more of an experiment.

Maybe Ellanse will help and last longer