A response from Proud' Urology with respect to AudienceK's question:
And here are their pros and cons and a comparison for
Ellanse and Megaderm:
1.
Ellanse
Pros:
- Effects last for over 4 years
- Provides a firmer and more natural feel in the penis
Cons:
- Cannot be dissolved or altered after injection
- Results cannot be changed, posing risks similar to fat transfer surgery
2. Megaderm
Pros:
- Can increase size by an average of 2-4cm
- Uses safe materials approved by FDA, KFDA, TFDA (Supplied by tissue banks in the USA, sterilized using E-Beam irradiation to preserve the original collagen structure)
- Provides permanent results and naturally becomes part of the patient's tissue
- Becomes part of the natural tissue
- Unlike silicone materials, it provides soft and natural results, with 100% visibility of blood vessels.
- All immunological protein reactions have been removed to prevent immune rejection.
- Maintains firmness during
Erection (Megaderm is effective for penis enlargement, but it doesn't directly improve erectile function itself. If there are issues with erectile function, separate treatment may be necessary)
Cons:
- Possibility of complications
- Requires surgery and recovery period
3. Comparison
1. Longevity: Megaderm is more permanent, while
Ellanse lasts over 4 years
2. Safety: Both have risks, but Megaderm is FDA approved while
Ellanse cannot be altered
3. Naturalness: Both provide natural results, but Megaderm becomes part of the patient's natural tissue
4. Procedure:
Ellanse is an injection, while Megaderm requires surgery
Hope this answers.