@SO: thank you for the encouragement and advice. I will definitely make sure that BJ is easy-going. It\'s unlikely I\'m going to be able to resist it at the end of those 4 weeks. The semen has backed up into my brain!
@cjruiz21: Make sure your research extends to both the old version of this forum along with this forum. The negative experiences (notably Volcano6509, messageman, patrick, whitesnake) definitely outnumber the positive experiences (notably marknmau, ck62498 and regularguy) on these forums, but the candidness of this forum is what makes it a must-read. DO NOT go by MNS. It\'s a virtual web shrine to Dr. Elist that has no bearing on reality. Here is my honest assessment of the experience thus far:
Pros:
-
Flaccid length is improved. At this point, it\'s increased from around 3 inches to 4.5 inches in length.
-
Erection Girth is improved. At this point, my
Girth is around 5.25 inches at the
Foreskin, 5.5 inches mid-shaft and 6 inches at the base.
- My wife loves the look.
- My
Dick noticeably stuffs my underwear, and even some pairs of pants.
- My confidence when being in the nude has already improved.
Cons (this should prove once and for all that I am no shill):
- The top of my shaft is mostly numb. I have been told by other implantees that this will subside after a few months. Other implantees such as Volcano6509 and messageman have reported this problem to have persisted even after removing the implant.
- My
Erect length has retracted by 1
Inch (was 5.5 inches pre-op, and is now around 4.5 inches post-op). I\'m reserving judgment on this as most members report the full
Erect length returning after a few months. However, I recall reading about some members whose pre-op
Erect length never returned.
- Dr. Elist\'s lack of forthrightness as far as complications. He likes to breeze right through them in the consultation, and act like any complications are universally applied to plastic surgery at large (as opposed to being specifically applied to his procedure).
- Dr. Elist\'s attempts to deflect blame for real complications occurring as a result of his procedure. With me, he attempted to blame herpes for lesions that were clearly NOT herpes (trust me, I know my herpes). It was an insult to my intelligence that he expected me to buy that horse crap, where I\'m aware of what herpes outbreaks look/feel like. It was also unnecessary, because I wasn\'t looking for someone to blame. I simply wanted to know what I should be doing to fix the problem. It left me feeling like he cared more about protecting his reputation than doing his f***ing job. Professional? I think not.
- Dr. Elist\'s lack of consistency in methodology. If he did himself a favor and took this forum seriously (instead of relying on his forum of phony sycophants at MNS), he might have deduced that internally stitching the glans was the wrong way to go. Marknmau is the only complication-free implantee here, and he believes it to be due to his lack of internal stitching. I believe I had internal stitching (between the glans and a mesh to buffer the implant), as have most other implantees on this forum.
In summary, educate yourself as much as you can as to experiences of other implantees (deciding for yourself what is objective and what is not). I decided that this was the right procedure for me knowing full well what the pros and cons were, and stand by my decision. Dr. Elist has what I believe to be a good innovation, but definitely has some work to do in terms of his ethics and professionalism. Dem\'s my two cents.