Welcome, Guest |
17 Apr 2024 00:10 | |
---|---|
thebiohacker.com/forums/threads/penis-gr...ker-sponsor.3262544/
Category: Penis Enlargement Exercises & Devices |
15 Apr 2024 05:48 | |
---|---|
I think if anyone follows your post history will know you aren't a shill. I think this site's history of 14-ish years has already established this site's credibility in terms of impartiality, skepticism, and scrutiny, especially as it pertains to more dangerous & high risk methodologies. Every Moderator who has ever overseen the discourse here were volunteers I had not known prior, and were very much capable of exposing this site or myself of any intentional misinformation. This might come as a surprise to many here (given my overzealous abhorrence of silicone oil in the penis), but micro-droplets via Silikon1000 (FDA approved silicone filler) in spot-correcting very minor contour irregularities may not be all that bad. We're talking single digit cc's (mL's) at most. This pales in comparison to the kind of silicone oil that some (blacklisted) providers employ, pumping easily 60-80+ cc's (mL's) in a single-go. When you add up two, or even three+ rounds, it really becomes worrisome. The propensity for migration and the potential for severe inflammatory reactions make it unfit for penile enlargement, period. *(For context and reference, most other fillers seldom exceed 25-30 cc's/mL's in a single-go)* That said, as always, elective enhancements of our penis through non-surgical injections or surgical means aren't without risk. However, there are some more acceptable than others, and some that are simply too unacceptable in terms of safety and efficacy. It should also be noted that even the Silikon1000 recommended micro-droplet technique is seldom (if ever) used by any Sponsors any longer, just because the filler in it of itself is too problematic (that isn't to say the technique itself is invalid). Avanti Derma discontinued its use years ago, and so did Dr. Victor Liu. As it currently stands, not a single Sponsor provides silicone oil injections, despite having access to it legally off-label (i.e. Silikon1000). My biggest concern with those who still offer it is how they manage to charge what they do at the volumes they inject... makes you wonder if any FDA fillers are even involved in their so-called "proprietary fillers." A even a big head scratcher when you realize the legal implications of pumping guys with a mystery cocktail and refusing to divulge the specifics of the filler; this isn't some Willy Wonka special recipe, every patient is entitled to their medical documentation, and what's been injected into their body should be no less important. Anyways, I thought I'd chime in on the silicone topic because as far I know, silicone oil (Loria & cronies) and the rigid silicone implant (Elist and cronies) still seem to do high volume business, allocating some of their profits obtained through unethical medicine to push content like the PhalloBoards further down the search results. Shame on Google, there isn't a source out there that discusses these topics anywhere else, to the extent that it does, for as long as it has, and that's even with me trying to invest my own money in staying relevant against this "ogres" ("giants" would be unintentionally complimentary). Still find myself fighting an uphill battle . PSA over, please resume topic at hand. |
01 Apr 2024 22:13 | |
---|---|
Thank you for the introduction. I feel honoured to be included in this forum to provide the best care possible to those seeking improvement in their size, function, and self-esteem. My undergrad degree is in Engineering Science with a Fine Arts minor. I feel I bring both sides of the brain to the table when it comes to medical sexual aesthetics. Your outcomes should be natural-appearing with real-feel texture and enhanced performance. I have managed to engineer my own protocols and continue to fine tune my technique using nonsurgical minimally invasive commonly used aesthetic techniques such as Botox, Dermal Fillers, and PRP. My Moto is “You Only Bigger. You Only Better”. That’s what I’m looking to deliver as an official P-Shot® and P-Long® provider and innovator in GROTOX® (Penile Botox) and SCROTOX™ (Scrotal Botox) in Canada, along with the P-GIRTH™ male augmentation procedure in both the U.S. and Canada. Sexual enhancement can be a very embarrassing topic to discuss with your doctor but my staff and I are here for you. Many consider me to be very personable and easy to talk to. I invite you to contact the office for in-person (preferred) or virtual consultation and consider visiting us for treatment. We are conveniently located just about 10min from Toronto Pearson’s International Airport (YYZ). We look forward to hearing from you. |
01 Apr 2024 16:32 | |
---|---|
I'm very excited to introduce Dr. John Leonardo! He provides what I especially like most in a Clinic, an experienced Practitioner that provides a One-Stop-Shop for Male Sexual Enhancement or Improvement Services, including Girth Injections. Here is a bit more I learned about Dr. Leonardo: John Leonardo, MD, the President of Leonardo Medicine Professional Corporation (LMPC), is an American Board of Anesthesiology Diplomat and a Chronic Pain Management Specialist in Ontario, Canada. He has been in private practice since 2006 and maintains a busy practice in the Greater Toronto Area and NYC offering services in Aesthetic Medicine, Regenerative Medicine, Sexual Health, and Anti-Aging. Dr. Leonardo holds the following distinctions in Sexual Health and Aesthetic Medicine:
Dr. Leonardo is an official P-Long provider. Anyone can simply plump the penis, but Dr. Leonardo is an artist at and prides himself on delivering larger, natural-appearing, real feel results. His motto “You only bigger. You only better.” Is evident in his results. Schedule a consultation and experience the supportive, sympathetic, attentive, and warm reception by Dr. Leonardo and Staff.[/i][/b] Please welcome Dr. John Leonardo of Toronto, Canada - our newest North American Size & Gains Provider! He also has an array of other services that are Men's Sexual Health related See more Services. Leonardo Medicine |
31 Mar 2024 17:26 | |
---|---|
First I have to say that AD is the founder of Penile-Pmma-Enhancement and have the track record & biggest knowledge. This is a 100% fact. And also only cause AD says that Pmma on the underside is not a good idea - I m still undecided to do it. In past I had 4 sessions Pmma at AD. In one of the sessions inadvertently a bit pmma went on the backside of the shaft at one spot while injection. What I can say: It‘s there now for 5 years - and I really like it. It could be: That its only everything well cause its only a conservative amount - as I said it went there by „accident“. Cause I do have respect regarding the AD-statements - I m still undecided. -and when I ll do it - then only maximum a conservative amount of 10 cc max. Also when the natural penis is oval - as a heterosexual man I think cylinder form is defining better. It‘s especially about the vertical girth, not that much about the horizontal girth (!) Since @6x5to6x7 has crazy volumes injected frontside & backside - I think he is an exordinaire example. It would be interesting to know what AD thinks about 1 very conservative session on the backside for people who are really interested in it. > A range of minimal volume what AD would call only a „touch-up“ session. Are the risks here at least reduced? |
28 Mar 2024 04:54 | |
---|---|
Leonardo Medicine Penile Augmentation Contact Form (Website) Leonardo Medicine Sexual Medicine Dr. John Leonardo Services of Interest to PhalloBoard Members: P-Girth - Non-surgical penile augmentation treatment using a choice of dermal fillers with or without PRP Grotox - Botox for Growers to relax penile retraction (shrinkage), improve erectile function, and increase endurance Scrotox - Scrotal Botox treatment to provide Scrotal Relaxation and to decrease excessive sweating P-Shot/Priapus Shot to improve size and function using PRP Location: 3826 Bloor St. West, Unit 2 Etobicoke, ON M9B 1K8 (Toronto) Other Forms of Contact: Phone 647-223-4436 -or- 647-526-5596 Email info @leonardomedicine .com -or- This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. |
26 Mar 2024 21:36 | |
---|---|
Beautiful thread comment from one of our patients: 3 Rounds (2019) I already had with Avanti Derma - Pmma Now I had my Session 4 - yesterday. This ll be my Journey-Documentary. C A S E: Empty Area In all 3 sessions a pretty large area remained pmma-empty (or significant less pmma / squishy) Potential reason: I had a history of FFT (2018). So maybe this could be the reason the filler could not settle there properly. Arguments against this Hypothesis: a) There are tons of good reviews of people who got FFT and after that a good Pmma result. b) The even bigger argument: There are also Clinics who do FFT & PMMA togheter for example with BellaFill - intention: To reduce the total costs. phalloboards.info/forum/general-discussi...pmma.html#1308715311 BUT - To be fair: Casavantes tells us already - People with history of FFT are not the ideal candidate. Otherwise on the website it‘s written a bit different. „(…)Autologous fat transfer typically results in irregularities but develops a light degree of fibrosis that facilitates soft tissue fillers’ implants. These patients are good candidates for phalloplasty.“ Why I come back ‚so late‘ with my issue ? In the years meantime I was not „unbusy“. I was loose-cut before and I wanted to become the ideal candidate. Patience & Effort: 3 Operation I had — To get the shaft-skin tight like I have it now. Penile Webbing surgery (has also subtle effect on your shaft skin) + distal (low) tight-cut. This effort was in the years: •2020 / •2021 / •2023 (!) @Tight cut Advantages: A. You make it your doctor so much easier to install the implant with a tight cut. Also it‘s the recommendation of Dr. Casavantes. B. Settle-Time of the Filler (the first days) Especially in my case (empty area) I want to reduce migration significantly with that tight cut. So the product stays where it has been injected. C. Usage: Filler gets nice compressed while erection. Why Avanti Derma again? S E R V I C E In all this years there popped up a lot of alternatives & new Pmma Options. Why I decided to go to Avanti Derma again: The Service. To give an example: ..(As I said -in all my 3 sessions this area remained empty/squishy).. Service: When In Session 3 -as part of the aftercare appointments- Dr. Casavantes saw that this area again could not hold any pmma. He suggested proactive (!) that I can come the next day again (costless!) so that they fill more in this particular area. Beside that they really check everyday on you …. Especially Ian. ( Give Ian a tip… he deserves it! ) Please do not understand that other offices have bad services: I can only tell my experience. L I N N E A S A F E Also: Especially in my case - I want that the carrier-substance gets absorbed fast - That the filler settles fast and stays where it has been injected. …And there is some evidence that the bovine-carrier with BellaFill takes longer to absorb / the filler has longer time migration-potential. So I think LinneaSafe is the better product when it comes to Penile Enhancement. Why I tried it now again when in all that 3 Sessions the area remained empty? Like I said it‘s not always about the office. Sometimes it‘s also about how qualified you are as a candidate. Now: With my (really amazing) tight cut „on point“ - the setting ll be significantly changed (old members here can confirm that) - especially regarding to my issue „filler migration“ - I can support that the filler stays there where it has been injected - in my empty area. Also with a tight cut - for your doc it’s more legitim to (potentially) install more of the product cause your skin-mobility is significantly restricted. ( Explaining „squishy/empty“ : While Erection - When you touch the area - your thumb sinks - through the skin - on your original shaft. Contrast to my other areas: They feel like very hard rubber while erection. While flaccid this contrast between the areas is already noticeable - but it gets even much more obvious while erection. ) |
22 Mar 2024 15:50 | |
---|---|
There are currently no fillers approved for penile enhancement,,, so everything anyone is using is off label (not FDA approved) for that treatment. I don't think that is bad per say as the fillers really give a natural fill. I think there are many good fillers but none last as long as Voluma. |
22 Mar 2024 13:18 | |
---|---|
Thank you very much, Dr. Sullivan. I greatly appreciate your feedback. If I can ask, Could you recommend any other brands that specialize in non-permanent fillers? I've come across Androfill and noticed it has received positive reviews online. From a layperson's perspective, a filler specifically designed for penile enhancement seems more suitable. This was my initial concern with more general brands like Juvéderm Voluma, which are used for various treatments (such as lips, cheeks, jaw, etc.). |
21 Mar 2024 23:31 | |
---|---|
Voluma stands out in the HA (Hyaluronic Acid) filler market in the U.S. for its durability, with results lasting at least 2 years. This longevity is a significant advantage over many other HA fillers, which often have a duration of about half that time. The enduring effect of Voluma makes it an attractive choice for those seeking longer-lasting enhancements without frequent touch-ups. Voluma provides a very natural sensation feel. This natural feel is essential for individuals looking for enhancements. If your poing to do HA as opposed to PMMA hands down I would pick Voluma. getmoregirth.com/voluma/ Dr. Sullivan |
21 Mar 2024 10:16 | |
---|---|
Thank you so much for shedding light on UroFill; that was news to me. Regarding Juvederm Voluma, it's been pitched to me as the top-tier option among semi-permanent fillers. Is that reputation justified, in your opinion? Also, I noticed a difference in application techniques between the two—UroFill being administered via direct needle injection, whereas Juvederm Voluma is applied with a cannula. Do you believe the cannula approach is generally preferable? |
21 Mar 2024 08:47 | |
---|---|
I've had a couple of procedures at HE Clinic, three rounds of Shockwave and 3 of PRP. In addition to a prevous PRP in London, I've now gained 1/4 of a inch of girth taking me to 5.5 inches, which I'm pretty happy with, even though it's a lot less than the typical filler gain, because it's all actual penile tissue and I was decently big to begin with. The clinic was professional, smart and clean. The doctors spoke fluent English and took the time to answer questions, even random 'free consultation' ones about varicocele etc, didn't act like they are on another plane of knowledge to us mere mortals (Eastbound I'm in HK too, you'll know what I am talking about), and didn't push unneeded or unasked procedures (endless blood tests etc). I didn't do fillers but have heard several positive reports for HeClinic now. Masterpiece seems to be growing in popularity and is very cheap...they use Neuramis which is a Korean filler. We've had one report of a guy getting that filler in London. The hospital seems much more Thai-oriented but the doctors do appear to speak English. If anyone has experiences of N|euramis I'd be keen to hear more. I fully agree with Skeptical that you only have one dick so don't go cheap, but HA is relatively safe and of course reversible if you don't like the outcome. |
20 Mar 2024 09:29 | |
---|---|
Thank you so much for shedding light on UroFill; that was news to me. Regarding Juvederm Voluma, it's been pitched to me as the top-tier option among semi-permanent fillers. Is that reputation justified, in your opinion? Also, I noticed a difference in application techniques between the two—UroFill being administered via direct needle injection, whereas Juvederm Voluma is applied with a cannula. Do you believe the cannula approach is generally preferable? |
19 Mar 2024 16:09 | |
---|---|
Urofill is not a filler, it's a network of clinics. I believe they use HA but what brand(s) I don't know. There are some clinics that concoct their own fillers or buy in bulk from China which you should avoid. You're better off getting HA made by a pharma company, with lot numbers and packages opened in front of you. |
19 Mar 2024 13:05 | |
---|---|
This is one of my points. I hear folks say this is the view some doctors have. My question is, where is the medical evidence. Where is the data? When has this ever actually happened? To my knowledge and many years of research I have read zero cases of filler on the underside of the penis causing any issues with the urethra or urine flow. Perhaps it’s because the medical establishment simply and holistically took a conservative view and very few have actually had it done. So the numbers simply haven’t been available. Excluding silicone bros, if you have had filler injected on the underside of your penis, please sound off here and let us know your results. I know of three, including myself. I’m sure there are hundreds more. Data Point: I have had Bellafill injected in the underside of my penis by Dr_Rupeka and have had amazing results with zero negative effects. Anyone else? |