TOPIC: Does A Bigger Dick Change Things?

Confucius say: man who get penis enlargement surgery who then say penis size doesn\'t matter is more fucked up than a soup sandwich.

In all seriousness I think the guys have tried nicely to say you Mr. EQ that your opinion is valued but your condescending tone is not. But besides all that, from an outsiders point of view you have zero credibility due to the fact that you had the enlargement performed and then are stating size doesn\'t matter? That\'s wack, and who cares your a scientist? Kind of full of yourself now that your penis is bigger. Like you synthetically went from a beta to an alpha. Please stop the arguing bruh, it\'s making you look like an asshole.


This of course I mean in the nicest way

eqstudent, I am glad that you are a real man with a pair and an enhanced Cock enjoying the company and tearing up asses of \"modern\" new york ladies. I really am. Good for you. Keep it up! Bear in mind though that you won\'t tear up anything, in the sense that all those asses have already been torn by other men.

I can assure you: I am not whining (I did two months ago when my grandmother passed away) and the man in my mirror is just fine. I hope the one in yours is too, but it is worrying that you are so distressed, rancorous and logically feeble when you write.

When I wrote that sex is an overrated pastime, I meant it. I will dwell on my opinion a bit more below. It is not nonsense. It just is, in your opinion! I did not write that acoustic waves travel in vacuum. That would be nonsense. It is hilarious how you always feel that your ordinary opinions are facts ! And trying to pump them up with modifiers such as \"sheer\" (as in \"sheer nonsense\") will not move them to higher ground, I am afraid.

As much as any healthy bloke I do enjoy sex which I regularly have with my long term partner. I was putting things in social/cultural context: I maintain that sex is excessively worshipped in our time, and that there are other activities that can deeply thrill and give scope to intelligent men. If not, we would still hide in caves and fear lightning.

Clearly, you\'d need moderate lateral thinking (or just thinking, in my opinion) to understand my previous posts. You would have promptly insulted Lord Chesterfield if you had heard him saying about sex that \"pleasure is momentary, the position is ridiculous and the expense damnable\":

\"Sheer nonsense!!!, sheer nonsense!!!\"

eqstudent, I do have the time to discuss this matter with you further and debate on ideas of sex, gender power dynamics and society from Plato to De Sade, Foucault, Verene, Baudrillard, Posner etc.

but I don\'t have the interest. This conversation with you is over.

thehulk wrote: ...But besides all that, from an outsiders point of view you have zero credibility due to the fact that you had the enlargement performed and then are stating size doesn\'t matter?

It is fascinating that at least 2 members who responded on your thread and told you in no uncertain terms that they did not think you should have enlargement in fact have had enlargements themselves! My view on your credibility is 10 times lower that your view of mine.

supa wrote: I can assure you: I am not whining (I did two months ago when my grandmother passed away) and the man in my mirror is just fine. I hope the one in yours is too, but it is worrying that you are so distressed, rancorous and logically feeble when you write

Really, lets see.

\'Reasons why men should not date \"sluts\"\'

supa wrote: Why? Because he married a virgin. .... Today girls sleep around...

Evolutionarily speaking men are not \"men\" any more in the sense that we have stopped marking our territory...

Emasculated liberal pseudo-intellectuals will try hard to negate the problem...

Do you even read the stuff that you write and you are trying to call me out as distressed and logically feeble.

FYI a blow up rubber doll that you are worried will leave you for a bigger Dick is not a long term partner.

Skeptical One wrote: The point is that it makes you sound like a rude prick. I responded in kind in hopes that you\'d see how it \"sounded.\" I was hoping you would sense some disrespect, not because I meant to disrespect you, but so that you could see how it had an affect on others. It\'s easy to type away behind your screen, sometimes oblivious to your own arrogance.

That is the difference between you and I. I meant no disrespect to anyone. As you yourself recently pointed out: sometimes it is difficult to tell the intent of a post. I posted like I am joshing with my boys sitting down having a few drinks after work. That was the spirit of \"grow a pair\". I posted to 2 members that I have had I thought very good public and pm exchanges with.

You are right, I can tell from your reactions you guys are not my boys and we are not just joking around in Love, Lust, and Vanity. My mistake!!

You cannot get it, can you. I was portraying the general sociological picture. For instance, it is a fact that men have little control on issues such as, say, abortion (most women in this time believe it is their right to make a unilateral decision when it comes to abortion). This is emasculation, in my view.May be you \"are not longing to marry clueless virgins who have not slept with other men\". So much the better as it is highly unlikely that you would get any (I mean young, attractive virgins - I am not factoring in old spinsters with personality disorders). That ship has sailed: You are a middle aged divorced man with a child. You are not good mating material for young virgins: you like research, so read it up.You say that you \"are not hiding in fear and afraid of the Sarah Jessica Parkers of the world\"; again, so much the better, as you do not really have a choice, in my opinion. Given your current status (as summarized above) you are now likely to meet and fuck only women who have been fucked quite a lot before meeting you (all asses you can get have already been torn, as disclosed to you in my previous post). You can get them a bit younger than you though, and you should. Cute Parkers! Enjoy.All good of course. Nothing wrong. The point I was trying to make is that my readings, internet browsing and conversations with people at parties and dinners have lead me to believe that some men (most men?) deep down don\'t like it. I might be wrong. We have stone age minds with stone age needs and it is debatable whether our \"needs\" have really managed to evolve as fast as society over the past forty years. I do not think they have. Just a thought, just an opinion.

Do not worry about me and my long term partner. We are fine. Will call you for advice if I run into the risk of divorcing because of penis size related issues. Like you, I could always get a few shots of PMMA. And may be I just get luckier than you.

supa wrote: That ship has sailed: You are a middle aged divorced man with a child. You are not good mating material for young virgins: you like research, so read it up.

Now that I know we are not joking get it all out dude. You will feel a lot better. Young virgins, is that desirable? Wow you are not a pedophile I hope. Get it all out.

At the end of all this, I will still be me and you will still be whatever you are.

Gotta run, my Texans are down by 10 with only 4 minutes to go.

You guys are raping the corpse of what was once an actual thread. That said, this is far more entertaining than the original.

I was just curious about whether a bigger Dick changed the feeling of sex for both partners, not really in the grand socioeconomic sense of \"does a bigger Dick make America more free from the evil overlord class of oppressors.\"

Seriously though guys, this is fun. I sense a cage match.

At the end of all this, I will still be me and you will still be whatever you are

Now that you get responses for your arrogant tone, to your astonishment you find that the penny has dropped. Your late wording manoeuvre about not wanting to be disrespectful is not credible and comes too late.

Finally, the joke about pedophilia is indeed very graceful. Won\'t comment further.

I will still be a man of reason whereas you will continue to be a condescending soul: nothing, absolutely nothing which you have exhibited in this forum justifies your attitude: you have to completely recalibrate the concept of yourself: from the way you write it is totally thrown off balance; it would be funny if it were not tragic.

supa wrote: Finally, the joke about pedophilia is indeed very graceful. Won\'t comment further.

Shit my Texans lost!

Sorry dude that was no joke. Anyone who would make a statement like:

supa wrote: I mean young, attractive virgins

in 2013 (unless they are 14 years old) is at the very least so insecure that they cannot deal with real grown women or more likely have latent pedophile tendencies.

You are really, really creeping me out.

If I am creeping you out it has to be for the necessary reason that your IQ is seven standard deviations to the left of the population mean: there are young adult women (and men) that decides to stay virgin until marriage. I obviously was talking about them. Only you (given your critical value in the distribution) could think I was discussing children. Revolting.

Granted, men and women that make the choice of not experimenting with sex before marriage are a minority but particularly in the US (but not just in the US, in Europe as well) there has been a recent social tendency to support the views of this minority. Incidentally, I do not necessarily share their ideas. The question I and friends of mine were asking at a party a few weeks ago though is why is there this gradual reappearance of traditional values in various geograhical areas of the western civilization; in my previous posts I was sketching a possible answer.

eqstudent, I warn you once: if you continue to play with pedophilia, even after my unnecessary explanation, I will ban you.

EQStudent
That pedophilia remark is way over the line.

The term \"young virgins\" in no way implies any latent pedophile tendencies. It is naturally assumed that children are virgins, so thus, if a person specifies \"virgin\" it clearly indicates they are referring to people of an age deemed old enough to be engaging in sexual activity.

For example, when Britney Spears first came to public attention, there was lots of speculation over her virginity. But no one ever talks child sex abuse victims as not being \"virgins\".

Basically, in popular culture, virginity is very much associated with people who would be viewed as physically ready for sexual activity. You don\'t ask \"is she still a virgin?\" about 10 year old girls, but it\'s a very common question about girls in the later teens.

I bet if you asked any healthy minded guy what they envision when they hear the term \"young virgin\" it would be a girl like say Britney Spears when she released \"Hit Me Baby One More Time.\"

Now EQstudent, and I swear this isn\'t a cheap retort to your insult to Supa, but it is far more worrying that you equate the term \"young virgin\" with pedophilia. As i said previously and I bet virtually all our members will agree with me, most people relate virginity to people physically ready for sex, yet you\'ve managed to equate it to having sex with children. I promise you and I again this isn\'t a cheap retort, but virtually no one else on the forum would read the term \"young virgin\" and think this could be related to children. Virtually everyone else would have pictured something like the girls in Barely Legal etc. So you have to ask yourself, why did you make that leap?

Btw, I\'m not sure how the posts you\'ve made tonight will go down with SO.

I sincerely hope that eqstudent will resist defending what cannot (logically) be defended. But then again, it would be against his nature. I still hope nevertheless.