TOPIC: FFT with Morganstern

Yes The 2 inches is Flaccid length. I'm in only about 3 Flaccid and 5 Erect .. so would increase to 5 inches Flaccid and 6 inches Erect

wildcat44$ wrote: Yes The 2 inches is Flaccid length. I'm in only about 3 Flaccid and 5 Erect .. so would increase to 5 inches Flaccid and 6 inches Erect

Hang in there Wildcat. The important thing is your problems are fixable and will be fixed.

Any new updates on Morganstern?

Going to Urologist to get fully checked before I start my planning.

If I was able to get even an Inch and a half of Flaccid I would be happy.

I\'m still not understanding how his lig cut is different than any other lig cut and why anyone expects to retain the fat from his procedure any differently compared to Giunta or Viel, its FFT, I don\'t see what his \"secret technique\" is or why it would lead to any different outcomes in regards to absorption and lumps.

No one understands what he does for his length procedure?

I think he has several options. He briefly mentioned he could increase Flaccid length on me by about 2 inches. He mentioned that an incision could easily be done on me. I asked what was different. With his method and he said he goes deeper ..I assumed cutting the main ligament ..he didn't elaborate more since I was there for a different reason . Will get more information once my current procedures are done

Wildcat

Looking forward to hear about your results.

wildcat44$ wrote: I think he has several options. He briefly mentioned he could increase Flaccid length on me by about 2 inches. He mentioned that an incision could easily be done on me. I asked what was different. With his method and he said he goes deeper ..I assumed cutting the main ligament ..he didn't elaborate more since I was there for a different reason . Will get more information once my current procedures are done

Here I thought he did Erect increases. Now I don't want to see him smh

wildcat44$ wrote: I think he has several options. He briefly mentioned he could increase Flaccid length on me by about 2 inches. He mentioned that an incision could easily be done on me. I asked what was different. With his method and he said he goes deeper ..I assumed cutting the main ligament ..he didn't elaborate more since I was there for a different reason . Will get more information once my current procedures are done

I thought cutting the ligament was a crap shoot. 2 inches is a lot. How can he tell that you would get that much length?

Thanks. Hope things are going well for you now.

Yes things much better. Morganstern mentioned off hand about the lig cut. Wasn't trying to sell it. I personally wouldn't have it done . No way I could use a stretching device every day for several hours. And for a 1/2 to 1 Inch Erect gain (in the best scenario) not worth it to me

paperboi wrote:
Here I thought he did Erect increases. Now I don't want to see him smh

Literally the only reason I even took interest in him smh

Don't think he has a one size fits all. Have not had a detailing discussion with him on lengthening .I don't know exactly what he does. Have not really talked about it, since it is not what I'm seeing him for...For me , Girth or length doesn't really matter unless ED/peyronies issue is resolved

Any update pics?