TOPIC: Heard of PMMA (Medical Grade) OR Dr Casavantes? [PART 2]

skatezy, that\'s probably easily answered, it\'s about a tenth of the cost !

EP when you say Dr C confirmed it can be performed, are you talking about Artefill ?

I can see them. For some reason I could not some time earlier. May be a few kinks in the website which still needs to be run-in a little more?

supa wrote: Guys, I cant see my attachments in my past two posts anymore (the EM pictures). Have they been removed?

I can still see them. Be sure you are logged in, because that is the only way to see uploaded photos.
If you are logged in and still cannot see them, please let me know.

Dd71, I agree with your plan to have the 10% concentration. It\'s what I would do too.

Electronic microscopic images of Artefill attached below (S. Cohen, Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2010 30:438).

Electronic microscopic images of Newplastic attached below (S. Cohen, Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2010 30:438).

Hi Guys,
I\'m calling forth your advice regarding the compatibility of PMMA injections with ulterior NATURAL growth enhancement. I am starting to undertake intensive hormonal treatments associated with directly injected vascular enhancers. This means that once I get my first session of PMMA and its associated collagen buildup my penis might still grow a good bit if the testimony seen below is valid.
phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/sho...9224459&postcount=11
I am starting to take Chorionic Gonodotropin (better known as Pregnyl) at 3000 IU per week injected under the pelvic skin. I plan to also take a strong Erectile Dysfunction injection daily directly into the penis - ouch! Add to that DHT with enhanced penetration using DMSO as a carrier and there is a small chance of actually experiencing noteworthy penis growth by chemical means. Wouldn\'t the collagen strands generated by PMMA, with their harder buidup, tend to resist growth pressure not so much longitudinally but mostly of girth? The last thing I want is for PMMA induced collagen layers to PREVENT harmonious penis englargement and reduce my girth potential ? ! ?
HC

Forum members with medical/chemistry background please look at the legends of the EM images I have attached in previous posts.I have noticed the following:The Artefill beads in picture A of the first attachment look bigger than the Newplastic beads in picture B of the second attachment. But if you read the legend at the bottom of the pictures, you notice that the picture A of the first attachment (Artefill) has been magnified 400 times whilst the picture A of the second attachment (Newplastic) has been magnified 250 times. Furthermore, the length unit in Artefill picture A is 100 micron whereas the length unit in Newplastic picture A is 200 micron. They also differ in length between them in the legend (check this with a ruler), however the width of the two pictures is the same. You need to be a bit cautious and reproportion in order to compare.

I am also considering an adjunct to the DHT gel combined with DMSO: it is the gel form of TriMax which itself is an injectible combination of:
AlprostadilprostaglandinPapaverinevasodilatorPhentolaminealpha blocker
In gel form TriMax-Gel could be applied at the same time as Andractim DHT cream along with DMOS and this mixture would be especially capable of penetrating the shaft and glans throughout all of their structures. This might have an added benefit of placing the ingredients in the central soft tissue structure leading up to the glans, (which presumably wouldn\'t be reached by a shaft base injection into one of the two lateral veinous structures) ensuring a more coherent hormonal response throughout all bodies of this organ. This topical application of TriMax-Gel (with or without DHT) could presumably be done instead of or in addition to a Erectile Disfunction daily injection of TriMax injectible or another ED injection at the base... FWIW
HC

supa wrote: Electronic microscopic images of Newplastic attached below (S. Cohen, Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2010 30:438).

How are we certain that the New Plastic photos you posted aren\'t from the pre-selection process?
And if they are post-selection process, then is it possible (depending on the frequency of irregular PMMA) one could conceivably find a similar \"snapshot\" among Artefill beads? I\'m wondering this because you see no such irregularities in the New Plastic photos in the link here ( www.biomedical.med.br/site/en/processo.asp and has noticeable differences in both smoothness and density than the pictures you provided (at least from what\'s discernible at those scales).
I should note (though the text is real small), it appears it has been zoomed 500x (correct me if I\'m mistaken), and the length unit is 100 micron.

@HC

I think you may be right by thinking that the PMMA \"MAY\" effect all that stuff that you are doing at once. I\'d suggest a staged plan. Finish the medical stuff first, then give it a few month to stabilize then go for PMMA.

Guys, I cant see my attachments in my past two posts anymore (the EM pictures). Have they been removed?

@SO

As mentioned in my posts, in the legend you read that EM picture of Artefill has been zoomed 400x. Length unit of the picture is reported to be 100 microns. In contrast, EM picture of Newplastic has been zoomed 250x and the length unit is 200 microns. I have also noted that in the legend the lengths of the two length units is different whilst the dimensions of the two pictures are the same.

And my point just was: why would you use different zooms and length units in pictures if you want to optically compare shapes??? I cannot see the scientific logic behind! The only explanation I can come up with is that the zooming choice simply reflects the bias of the author of the article (other possible explanations from forum members are welcome).
I paste below the disclosures at the end of the Cohen\'s article:

Dr. Steven R. Cohen is on the Medical Advisory Board of Suneva Medical, Inc., the company that manufactures and distributes ArteFill. He has received stock options and periodicreimbursement for travel, lodging, and consulting. He is also aninvestigator in the FDA postapproval safety study for ArteFill.

Why were those pics removed? . Anyways, if dr. Cohen is working for suneva, his opinions are going to be remarkably bias. I know the corporate world very well, trust me I\'ve seen bigger company\'s throw smaller company\'s with BETTER products under the bus. Not saying thats what\'s going on, just stating its possible.