samsmithms wrote: I did a phone call with Allen. I was eliminated because I am not Circumcised. Dr Carney requires patient to be Circumcised.
That's a new development - last I checked, I knew they
preferred Circumcised men, but it appears they've chosen a complete departure from uncut penises. This isn't a surprise to me, I've been told by a number of Doctors (and from patient reports on the forum) that uncircumcised units tend to be more prone to aesthetic irregularity, and no one wants "unhappy customers."
I'd strongly recommend men who are uncut and wish to remain that way to consider more temporary filler options like
Hyaluronic Acid (
HA). That isn't to say uncut men who have undergone alternative fillers can't have successful outcomes, but trying to manage aesthetic irregularities with bio-stimulatory fillers (i.e.
Ellanse and
PMMA) proves more challenging in the long-run. Even fat-based treatments could prove just as challenging, like
FFT (fat) or
Renuva (synthetic fat). The other alternative would be to go for lower volumes. And of course, the final alternative would be to seek out a practitioner who provides these procedures to uncut men, but be mindful that these potential aesthetic irregularities come at a higher chance.
According to one of our resident Sponsors,
Avanti Derma, they describe the aesthetic irregularity more common with uncircumcised / uncut men as the
"accordion effect." Per
Avanti Derma, they describe this as:
"The accordion effect is a common thing among uncircumcised patients that have tried Girth enhancement with fillers, and it is the clumping of the skin at the base of the penis when it is retracted. Making sexual intercourse difficult."