TOPIC: PMMA Journey at Avanti (Beginning 5.16.2022) (Photos Inside)

Nice work done mate, I was just wondering since you went with 30/10% could that be the cause of the imperfections ? Surely going all 10% first round or at least 20% first round would have created a more uniform effect ? I guess I am saying mixing 30% with 10% seems risky for esthetics. Let me know please how you feel about that? Because I am on my own journey too. But I am planning to hear them out when I visit Avanti Derma. But from a pure logic and research stand point I have seen posts suggesting 10% PMMA being he safest route for first timers. And once that 10% has been installed let's say the follow up rounds (2nd round) to be for the corrections to add + 0.3 - 0.4 gains if you proceed sensibly and speak to the physician.

There have been many posts from tried and true members indicating + online videos of Dr Casavantes him self saying he prefers going with 10% initially him self. The first dose of PMMA seems to have the most impact Girth wise. Once that gain is achieved then it is much easier to correct even if you use higher % of PMMA for example 20% or 30% for second round.

I might be wrong here but 30% gives the most gains + harder results but it requires a lot of after care for slightly more gains..
So it would be obvious to me that you start with 10% for reasonable gains, less after care worries...
And finally if you want a little extra or what to correct something you again to add the percentage of PMMA that Avanti Derma and their physicians suggest 10%, 20% or 30% depending on your situation.

The main point I'm trying to make is we all ofcourse want the most bang for our buck. But at the end of the day is your buck worth more than what your really aspiring to achieve as an end result ? Personally I think not, you want bigger.... better....or even more the esthetic value over all (which is a must if you ask me). Just my two cents. Money is secondary to your optimal goal. You don't need to be crazy big to be happy as a man. In my case I am 5.1 inches Girth, if I got 0.6 first round safely with 10% then another 0.4% with 20% PMMA I am literally golden right ? Do you really want a woman to grab hold of your Dick and tell you instantly its fake or something is wrong. I have made love to many women with my 5.1 Inch Girth (Erect) natural Cock and they were very happy. Imagine what a well earned 0.7 Inch Girth can do for that story!? We have to be reasonable here right ?

I hope my logic is transparent enough to see things how I do. Greed is a really bad thing when so so much stands to be gained with simple pure reason from our = the ''customers point of view'' Thanks guys sorry if I was out of line in this post. I mean well and wish everyone the absolute best out come. I genuinely just want to be informed or enlightened which ever way you want to put it.

I believe the main imperfection, the Nodule isn't really the result of 10% vs 30%, but rather from the physiology of my penis. The area that was injected had very tight skin, so the pressure forced the filler out towards the injection site. The Nodule that formed was at that injection site where I wasn't able to squeeze out all of the filler. If it was 10%, I'm sure the Nodule would be smaller, but it would still be present. That said, I also think that had they used 10%, it wouldn't have addressed the aesthetic concern in that area. In my experience, the areas that received 10% filler tended to have a much thinner and somewhat inconsistent implant. Though since it's a lower amount, it's less "risky." On the flip-side, the 30%, again IMO, had a more consistent implant, though the repercussions of misshaping the 30% could be catastrophic if it bunches up.

Your opinion is a lot like mine when I first started this process, basically, I thought 10% all around would be the safest bet. I can cover the whole area with a thin layer and see how that goes... Where I differ now is that certain areas are better with 30% and others with 10%. In round 1, I got most of the 30% around the base of the shaft, and the remaining 10% was spread from the mid towards the top. I noticed that after this, the 30% acted as a sort of foundation for the rest of the filler, which at this point was a bit spotty. With Round 2, they used 30% to fill in voids and work out asymmetries it seemed, and the 10% to taper and even out the implant. Had I gotten 10% purely in round 1, I think I'd have an implant that was rather splotchy in consistency, but I can't be certain in this hypothetical scenario. I agree though that for those who want to minimize risks, lower the amount of filler you get in each round. I wouldn't necessarily say only do 10%, but I would definitely say don't over-do it on the cc's.

In regards to the implant being noticeable, I think there are two contributing factors: (i) aesthetics: does the implant visually trigger red flags, is it well shaped, are there nodules etc. We're all trying to optimize this part by minimizing any complications. (ii) The amount of filler: I'm convinced that after a certain point it is unavoidable that the filler will be noticeable (I mean that's kind of the point, isn't it). With more filler, you're adding more mass and the texture will just be different. That's the price one pays for a thicker Cock. In my case, the skin just feels thicker now, and where I used to be able to pinch it and move it around, now it's immobile and has a sort of rubbery weight to it (because that's what collagen feels like). So, for example, when a woman is giving a hand-job, it now requires lubrication, because the skin doesn't give and stretch the way that it used to. I have to imagine that she'd notice "something is different about this Cock." Although she may not jump to conclusions. I figure when it comes to having a serious partner, I'll need to tell them at some point that I had this done, but to me that's not the end of the world.

voile wrote: I believe the main imperfection, the Nodule isn't really the result of 10% vs 30%, but rather from the physiology of my penis.

This is precisely why I tell people that there is a degree of uncertainty in how collagen-based fillers settle in the end, and even the best injectors aren't going to be able to guarantee against these variables. This is also why I remind people that follow-up appointments are inevitable, even if most cases are minor irregularities/small nodules.

I suppose the only real way to (nearly but not 100%) guarantee a flawless first-time result would be to (1) have a quality/experienced injector, and (2) take a very conservative approach (like 5cc's +/- versus 15cc's +/-).

Fortunately these issues can be corrected over time, much like how you sand wood over & over after you've carved it out.

Thanks for the updates!

Thank you for your reply it means a lot to me, and besides you did well and the important thing is that you are happy. Have to give you props because you have done it. I am still in the soft ball league waiting for my turn to come up to bat for the big boys My congratulations to you mate and respect.

voile wrote: It now requires lubrication, because the skin doesn't give and stretch the way that it used to. I have to imagine that she'd notice "something is different about this cock." Although she may not jump to conclusions. I figure when it comes to having a serious partner, I'll need to tell them at some point that I had this done, but to me that's not the end of the world.

In your case I don't feel you over did it, also if no one mentions it I don't see why you should say anything first You'll be too busy looking good! www.youtube.com/shorts/aols5qVokog