Lexus27 wrote: @skeptical one. You have to read what i wrote. #Facts guys don\'t get what they pay for.
That\'s not a fact, that\'s a baseless assertion.
Lexus27 wrote: #Facts There are guys who are smaller and bigger but recieved the same amount of cc\'s.
So what? Not everyone responds the same way to a procedure that relies on collagen stimulation.
Lexus27 wrote: #Facts 10% isn\'t shit.
That\'s false. While there are instances where men have seen little-to-no-gains (myself included) using 10%, others have reported modest gains with 10%. Maybe it isn\'t as effective as 20% or 30% but it \"isn\'t shit.\"
Lexus27 wrote: #Facts guys talking about your paying for s but meanwhile there\'s a new person injecting your penis with PMMA? What\'s her actual experience besides dr.c training her?
Paying for s
implies paying for proficiency in technique and/or relevant experience. Dr. C is presumably the most experienced penile-injector that I\'m aware of in the Western Hemisphere and by extension, I\'d feel more comfortable with his trainees. I have not been under the care of Dr.
Morales so I cannot speak for her bedside manner. Simply being trained by Dr. C doesn\'t necessarily guarantee she\'ll be very good or the next \"Dr. C,\" but she certainly has a competitive edge regardless (being his protege).
Lexus27 wrote: #Facts PMMA is bought from Brazil which is dirt cheap so for guys not to get what they pay for is ridiculous which still saves them more on top of the rised prices. You cannot tell me skeptical one that it\'s fair that two guys with different penis length to receive the same amount. There\'s tons of evidence on that here.
If it\'s so dirt cheap, and if physician experience & technique are not of high priority, there are plenty of injectors out there, go for it. But complaining about pricing in a market economy is just a head-scratcher.
If your so worked up on the dollars & cents of a procedure that\'s still cheaper than some of its competitors & most of its predecessors, you may want to discontinue your penis enlargement endeavors. Cost is important, sure, but it\'s also dictated by simple economics. This forum is literally crawling with new names of up-and-coming physicians, maybe someone can offer a cost-effective alternative, otherwise this nickling and diming of CC\'s is ridiculous in the grand scheme of things.
That\'s just my opinion. I may seem to prefer defending
Avanti Derma, but I was more interested in debunking the notion that you were speaking in \"facts.\" Much of what you express is sentiment & opinion, let\'s not cheapen what the word \"fact\" actually means.
This thread has also devolved into name-calling and the original aim of this thread has been not only addressed within, but through many old & new progress reports. If you aren\'t content with AD\'s pricing, check out state-side
HA injectors, there are new names popping up on the forum all the time. Maybe through the exchange of first-hand accounts, phone calls, correspondences, etc, we can find competitors that will help bring some balance to the market. Till then, due to the stalled nature of this thread, I\'m locking it.