TOPIC: What is your gut feeling about pmma in the long term

Can always have it removed if things get really really desperate. MEdical tech will have advanced 10 years from now. It would still be worth it for me even if it\'s just a decade.

Is PMMA removable?
The one scientific paper posted here said \'not really, better add more PMMA on top of it if you have aesthetic problems\', something like that.

ps i already asked once
The silicon driplets - what is the bad thing about it? Why not take it instead of PMMA altogether?

@dream: You can\'t inject the same amount of volume with silicone as PMMA. It would pretty much guarantee migration. Silicone is pretty much a done deal once you get it. I can\'t imagine the effort required to remove silicone after the micro-droplet technique was used.

Thanks.


Just a little tidbit i came across accidently:

Here one of the first threads on this board, from 2011:
phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/its...89823?pid=1269338351

\'It\'s pmma or nothing?\'

\"As I\'ve started elsewhere , my belief is, given all the available techniques for girth enlargement, that pmma is the only real option.\"
\"At this point in time, yes I\'d have to agree. Its just the safest thing out there RIGHT NOW.\"

So it seems since more than 6 years pmma is the \'safe thing\', the one procedure to recommend the most.

Although perhaps phalloboards is supertiny worldwide and not represantive. Basically only 2 doctors do it (Tijuana and Nemekova Prague - and she does it only as a sidejob)?
Year after year more and more men do it. (I guess that\'s proven, isn\'t it? Every year more men doing penis enlargement operation).
It\'s still an obscure thing i guess. There is only one scientific paper.

I just cannot repeat my disbelief of men not writing in forums before they do an operation like this. Perhaps it\'s shame. It can\'t be not being internet-savy, can\'t it? (I am 35 and i grew up with the internet.. perhaps the 40 year olds are not used to forums? I don\'t get it)