I thought this was interesting to mention...
My dad (a doctor for 40 years) read the notes I attached above from Dr. Bloom (the full version - not just my cuts I posted), and he said there are major problems with them:
1. He doesn\'t even mention applying the silver nitrate in the notes, yet he billed my insurance for it. Since the silver nitrate caused all the problems, he probably deleted it from his notes (but I have 50 photos of it which are GPS coded and time stamped by the iphone...so...what would that even accomplish?)
2. He added in all the psychiatric wording to make me look worse in the event of litigation, which is moronic considering I have a psychiatrist (who can invalidate everything) + proof why I went in there (Lemperle\'s email and a
Dermatologist who knows I am not \"obsessed with biofilms\"). As far as my \"unhealthy obsession with the size and shape of my penis\" - well, you can judge. Regardless, I was in his office for 15 min. I have seen the same therapist for 1-2 years. I never brought up feelings of inadequacy due to penis size w/ my psychiatrist (who is gay and knows that gay men are size queens and it\'s an issue in the community). I\'ve had a lot of stress over the fact it has been fucked up since March...not the fact it\'s too small.
3. He said the wound was barely noticeable (again, probably doctored notes). My
Urologist said nobody on earth could consider that \"barely noticeable unless they were blind\"
So, to add to the malpractice, now we have fraud and spoliation of evidence.
So, good - this way, once I get my derm, uro, and psych to sign off on answers to questions like \"did I have an obsession with biofilms\" - I\'ll be sending it to the state regulatory agencies for physicians and to attys.He also should be disciplined by my insurance company for billing for a procedure (the silver nitrate) that is not in his notes. Though, he did the procedure - he\'s trying to pretend he never did while getting paid for doing it.