darkstaff wrote: Thanks for the support guys.
I\'m concerned that my doctor has no idea what PMMA is, and has no capacity to include a related cause within the scope of his diagnosis.
The good news is that I have no issue with my penis ... it seems to be fine... so I\'m hoping there is no relation... and instead is just a crazy coincidence that my health went south a few months after my procedure in June.
I had a CT scan with contrast about a week and half ago ... the complaint was pain in my abdomen, and pain when I took a full breath of air (pain on my left chest wall) ... it came back clean.
I got a copy of the CT scan, and it showed the penile area, and guess what ... I didn\'t see anything that would indicate PMMA ... is this normal? .. does PMMA not show up on CT scans? (Anyone know?)
Thanks!
Dark
The actual beads are a small percentage of the new tissue. It\'s not like silicone or other fillers.
PMMA is particulate, so it probably wont show up.
But don\'t go getting this stuff removed. It will be a nightmare to cut out and even then I doubt they\'ll remove it all.
Also, given that only 3% of the beads are even smaller enough to theoretically migrate, then that means at the very most, 0.06 cc of
PMMA could have migrated. Obviously that wont be the case, as not all that could have would have. In fact it\'s unlikely any has. When you consider all the other particles that get moved around the human body, I still don\'t get the worry of
PMMA migrating. Obviously if it\'s injected directly into vessels at the point of injection, then we\'ve seen this can have tragic consequences, but the chances of this are close to zero when using a micro cannula. I just can\'t imagine the CIA have
PMMA beads in their arsenal for assassinations.