faculae wrote: Therefore 10cc of 30% will have 3x as much active PMMA within it as opposed to the 10% formulation. In other words, one procedure of 10cc of 30% is equal to three procedures of 10cc of 10%, which is also equal to a single 30cc procedure of 10%, etc. The outcome would be theoretically identical, excluding any scar tissue build up if a person were to have three as opposed to one procedure.

That is to imply that the same amount of PMMA that has been fully assimilated into vascularized tissue, irregardless of the initial concentration, should feel the same. Therefore, if you have less of it, you will feel more like your original self. If you have more, you\'ll feel less like your original self.

What this comes down to is how dense the final installation of the PMMA beads is. My assumption is that if you have one procedure of 30% at say 20cc, the result would be identical if you took a three procedure route using 10% at 20cc each time. The density outcome would be the same. Therefore the \'feeling\' would be the same.

Men that opt for three 30% procedures will have 9x as much PMMA in their penis, over those that have three 10% procedures (assuming the same CC volumes are used.) And therein is where I believe the issue of firmness, or a rubbery feel, stems from.

Great post.

But in this theory the following should happen, but they do not:

1. - Guys with 30% should gain 3x (300%) as much as guys with 10%. That\'s not the case. Gains of 30% guys are actually only 25% bigger than that of 10%

from
phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/big...20198?pid=1294922077
:

phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/com...ns-6364826?&trail=15

Briceb has great statistics post about gains in 10 vs 30%.

~40 people in excel spreadsheets.

Average increase per cc on 10%: 0.03

Average increase per cc on 30%: 0.04

-> so, that's 25% more size increase with 30%

So I guess the 10% is more 'efficient' per pmma-bead ' because if 30% would be as efficient per pmma-bead, then the increase per cc should be 3 times bigger (300%) on 30% than on 10%, but it seems to be only 25%

But this statistic is probably better, it looks at how much people's girth increased in % compared to before the treatment ' and then calculated per cc:

Average size increase percentage per cc on 10%: 0.63% (for every cc of 10% penis girth became 0,63% bigger)

Average size increase percentage per cc on 30%: 0.79% (for every cc of 10% penis girth became 0,79% bigger)

So starting at 9.5cm, girth with 15ml of 10% would calculate me to be 10.4cm

and with 30% it would calculate me to be 10.6cm. So that is not a big difference it seems.

2. - Many many many guys report that at flaccid the 30% is very firm and 10% guys report that it is softer, it\'s like common knowledge here?

So there should be going on something else,

that makes the \'it\'s all about how much pmma is in your body\' theory not come through for me.

Could it be eg that with 10% the pmma beads are more apart, so that there is more collagen built per pmma-bead than with 30%? Eg with 30% it happens more often that eg 2 pmma beads stay next to each other, so there is less collagen per pmma bead. Technically i guess there has to be less collagen per pmma bead in 30%, because it\'s 3x the pmma beads but only 25% more girth (instead of 300% more)

Questions:

a. I think it is established here on the forum that at flaccid

- pmma in general is at least a bit more firm than a \'normal penis\'

- 10% pmma leads to less of this flaccid firmness than 30%

- 30% pmma leads to more of this flaccid firmness than 10%

b. How does it work in erect state?

A fear of mine is that 10% leads to softer erect penis.

I was sold on 10% and now i am not totally anymore