TOPIC: PMMA firmness VS pre PMMA

Hello guys,

This is a question that arises sometimes and which is interesting to me. So I made a poll.

How hard is your post PMMA Dick compared to pre-PMMA, firmer,as firm or less firm ? The question concerns Erect only and is asked for every concentration, multiple choice is allowed in case one had more than one concentration injected.

Please vote and merry christmas

What if I have had all of those percentages mentioned? I am still certain that I am more firm than I was pre-PMMA

Well you can answer for each one (multiple choices allowed).

I don\'t know if the poll suits good to each case... but I\'m interested to know what is the firmness like per concentration.

For example someone with 10% could tell it\'s less firm than pre PMMA. Or the poll could show that 30% is definitely firmer for everyone...

People opinions seem to vary so I thought a poll would be a good idea.

Thanks for your input.

Thanks, we\'re in the same boat smalljay, I had the idea of this thread after reading your recent post.

I agree that comments would help understand better. This said I\'m grateful for any participation, thanks people for taking time to vote.

It seems like the results are all over the place. I think that the biggest reason this is the case, isn\'t because of the PMMA, the concentration, or the technique... I think it\'s that the hardness of each man\'s individual erections vary. I think the PMMA is going to be the same regardless. Those with rock-hard erections may find that PMMA feels less firm, and those guys who never have \"diamond-cutter\" erections may find PMMA firmer. Does anyone else think there is validity to this theory? I\'m especially interested in the opinions of those who have had the procedure.

Good point, I was wondering the same.

I had very hard erections before PMMA and now after 4 sessions of PMMA and the last session being 30% concentration, I still find it LESS hard when Erect. It is not bad in any way, but for this post it is Less hard than pre PMMA. I think the theory above may have some merit to it.

But, the 10% I had in the first session was very very soft and mushy even after collagen had stabilized.

Yes, I hated the feel of the 10%, it was very soft and mushy compared to my regular pre PMMA erections. Now, the 30% hardness is still NOT as good as pre PMMA, but it is close enough it is not a problem for me.

Actually, the amount of \"hardness\" can be compared to one\'s penis. If you watch some porn (I do not like it but I have watched it) you can see how some men have very hard looking erections while others may have softer erections.

For me, pre silicone implant and pre PMMA, my erections were hard as a rock. After the elist implant Removal and after a few rounds of PMMA, I did notice my EQ is down a bit. I do blame that on the elist implant, some softness of the PMMA and of course the dreaded Aging process!

I failed to select it when I created the poll, then I wanted to edit and enable it but it seems impossible... maybe a mod or admin can do it...

Jelq Nicholson wrote: I failed to select it when I created the poll, then I wanted to edit and enable it but it seems impossible... maybe a mod or admin can do it...

I\'m not sure I understand. What exactly is it you\'d like us to do? We\'ll see if we can get it modified for you, just be clear in the directions, thanks

Btw, I voted for both \"firmness same as pre-PMMA\" and \"firmness more than pre-PMMA\" because it actually seems to vary a little (might be my own EQ to blame). It\'s either as firm or even firmer, but I don\'t recall it feeling less firm, and my last round was 30% concentration.

Surprised to see the number of \"less firm than pre-PMMA\" members, but in fairness, the sample size is still way too small to draw any conclusions. We need more voters. It\'s safe to say hundreds of men have had this procedure done... come on guys!

As some tips before actually making your vote:
Be sure to wait at least 6 weeks after a 30% round to make an assessment.Be sure to make this assessment when experiencing optimal Erection quality.If you have varying firmness, select the one that is most frequent (I failed to follow this suggestion lol) instead of multiple votes (Multiple votes from one person may skew the data\'s reliability).I\'m wondering if this poll should be remade with more specific options (which include \"firmness varies from such and such to such and such\") or if we simply need to modify this one?

Skeptical One wrote:

Jelq Nicholson wrote: I failed to select it when I created the poll, then I wanted to edit and enable it but it seems impossible... maybe a mod or admin can do it...

I\'m not sure I understand. What exactly is it you\'d like us to do? We\'ll see if we can get it modified for you, just be clear in the directions, thanks

I was replying to smalljay concerning the identity of voters.
I know it\'s possible to \"show voters\' identities\" when creating a poll, I wanted to enable it but forgot to do it before validation.
After that I tried to edit the poll but don\'t find how...

It would make sense that it\'s not possible to reveal identities of people who voted in a poll which was anonymous at first...

I hope I\'m clear, I suspect my english to be full of mistakes but I try my best...

Thanks for help

EDIT: you got me smalljay, It always take some minutes for me to write an answer lol

smalljay wrote:

Skeptical One wrote:
I\'m not sure I understand. What exactly is it you\'d like us to do? We\'ll see if we can get it modified for you, just be clear in the directions, thanks

I think he meant that he failed to select a function which enables others to see the names of specific members that voted for each option.

It was a reply to my question in the post before - AKA, I\'d like it if there were a way for me to look at the four votes on \'30% was less firm than my pre PMMA penis\' and see a list of the four members\' names who voted for that option. That way, I could message them and inquire more about their answer/situation.

However, I do realize that this may not be possible, and that also it may not be considered ethical by the mods here to give out info that is that specific in regards to each poll.

Hm. I can see the names but whether these members voted under the assumption of anonymity is something I don\'t know. Then again, this poll isn\'t conveying any sort of information that requires anonymity.

The names of the \"penis is less firm than pre-PMMA\" are as follows: Mustang2020, Dance With Dragons, thewingman, thehulk
(if any voter has an objection to their username being revealed in a poll, please PM me and I\'ll edit this post accordingly)

Skeptical One wrote: Btw, I voted for both \"firmness same as pre-PMMA\" and \"firmness more than pre-PMMA\" because it actually seems to vary a little (might be my own EQ to blame). It\'s either as firm or even firmer, but I don\'t recall it feeling less firm, and my last round was 30% concentration.

Surprised to see the number of \"less firm than pre-PMMA\" members, but in fairness, the sample size is still way too small to draw any conclusions. We need more voters. It\'s safe to say hundreds of men have had this procedure done... come on guys!

As some tips before actually making your vote:
Be sure to wait at least 6 weeks after a 30% round to make an assessment.Be sure to make this assessment when experiencing optimal Erection quality.If you have varying firmness, select the one that is most frequent (I failed to follow this suggestion lol) instead of multiple votes (Multiple votes from one person may skew the data\'s reliability).I\'m wondering if this poll should be remade with more specific options (which include \"firmness varies from such and such to such and such\") or if we simply need to modify this one?

I totally agree with that.
Feel free to modify it the way you want. Maybe we should try some propositions before releasing the final form of the poll...

And thank you for participating, this subject is very interesting to me and probably to anyone who considers having it done. Probably less to those who already did it