From a research prospective only. Its to expensive for the duration you will have it. That is the consensus of many members here. Some say its squishy, others say its natural. I have meet to people personally and those were there opinions ( so 50/50 ).
- Im sure someone on here has had it done that can answer you.
However, Advantage: If you wanted to test out what you Dick looks like being bigger or see how a certain amount of ML\'s produces for you .
- with that said. I dont PMMA and never got HA so I cant say exactly how each would produce in regards to size gained from a certain amount of ML\'s
Advantages - totally reversible, lumps/granuloma can be fixed, can give a good enhancement - routinely 1\" Flaccid and 1/2\" Erect, last for years
Disadvantages - more mobility initially - will usually settle into fixed place, our experience is that after 2 yrs most guys will retain 90% of the maximum Girth but it has contracted slightly from the base and towards the glans( so the top-up is mostly there). It is slightly softer than stimulatory fillers like PMMA/Ellanse
My experience Pros, zero issues, easy to smoothe stuff out, no problem if something goes wrongcons, never ending cost to sustain, I don\'t think you come close to retaining 90% after 2 years, 1 year yeah, 2 years no. More like 30% or so. I\'ve had a few lots done now on/off , always good results, some folks say a bit squishy, cant say I noticed that , its hard AF Erect.I am looking for something more permanent though, just a pain and expensive going back all the time.