dcpimpin12 wrote: He has told me this lig cut surgery wasnt a good idea and that the doctor who did it should have his license revoked..... so anyway i am dissapointed in the surgery i dont think is the surgery i think is the doctor to be honest.
I\'m sorry to hear about your issues but you knew going into this that it did not have a good track record. There is no way to know for certain how much of the doctor\'s expertise (or lack of) played in a role in your outcome, but what is certain is that this method rarely (if ever) reports having positive & permanent
Erect gains.
Keep in mind that most post-op ligament programs require a rigorous stretching campaign that can last at least 3 months before any realization of gains. You may end up spending the first few months regaining your original length, and another 3-6 months seeing potential additional gains. So as far as length is concerned, you still have a long way to go and you more than likely will be able to regain at least your original length back.
Out of curiosity, if you have the resources to see a
Urologist for a consultation, and you seem to care about what he has to say, why didn\'t you see your
Urologist before the ligament procedure? I\'m only asking to highlight the importance of the decision making process to all of our readers. This forum\'s overwhelming consensus has been that this procedure is hit-or-miss (more often on the miss side, with no solid proof of permanent
Erect gains), so you had to have known going into this that the odds were against you.
As I stated in bold, you can still turn this around and be one of the few who report positive gains in the long run. Rooting for you, just reminding you & others that
Phalloplasty is still a very risky endeavor.