I am really happy for you olafspo at the end you have reached your goal, I agree with you no more rounds (wooow you had in total around 106 cc @30% = 954 millions of PMMA beads ), and imo wait for >2-2.5 years to go for touch-ups (esp. if you have only minor esthetic issues)
That\'s very, very cool!! I\'m naturally have 5 Inch Girth and can\'t wait to get to 7\". I\'m working on my length at the time. Im hoping to have a monster Cock within 3 years by the time in 28. What is your current length?
Wow remarkable aesthetic outcome for having had a total of 106 ccs!!! I should note to readers on this forum who may be tempted, going that big usually has its drawbacks, but olafspo is definitely an exception to the rule.
Lookin really good, must feel great to \"retire\" from PE (as I\'m assuming you\'re doing?).
Sizemic wrote: Have you had any women not able to take it? The little Asian girl I am dating now definitely couldn\'t... she has trouble with mine.
Assuming he\'s single and mingles, he\'s bound to come across \"harder to penetrate\" partners, maybe more often than not. He\'s much larger than the average porn star (especially where Girth is concerned) and the odds are on his side that he\'s the biggest any of his partner\'s have ever had. But you\'re also in that \"same boat\" Sizemic, as you\'ll likely never come across any partner who has been banged by a unit volumetrically larger than yours, and if they say they have, odds are they have the measurements all wrong & distorted in their heads.
Besides, Olafpso got lucky to be quite frank. That much PMMA with virtually no apparent aesthetic issues?? I don\'t mean to sound like a preacher Sizemic, but given your aesthetic & size success, I\'d refrain from going any bigger...hate for you to regret something very difficult to reverse because you wanted to jump from the 95 percentile to the 99 percentile. Ultimately that decision is yours, but Olafpso progress report is a rare exception, and not the norm...but I know you know that
Olafpso, you appear to be uncircumcised, is that correct (sorry if I missed it somewhere before)?
If that\'s the case, I think that may have helped you a lot aesthetically-speaking. Being uncircumcised makes the glans-to-shaft proportionate unapparent, and so you really don\'t suffer from any kind of \"glans-dwarfing\" or \"pig-in-the-blanket\" in the Erect state.