TOPIC: Zayne's PMMA

6 weeks post-R1:

Strong EL: BG, 6.25, Lower-MS 5.4, Upper-MS 5.75
Weak EL: BG 6, Lower-MS 5.25, Upper-MS 5.5

@bananas, Length is same as before. I think Girth makes it look shorter, but it\'s just the illusion of shortness.

exhibit B

Looking good man. Any plans for a second round?

@ Big John,
Thanks! Going in for a second round soon. I\'ll try to even things (ridges, uniformity of length along shaft) and get at that circ-scar-gap. Waiting to see how thing are working out for you, Big Guy.

Looking great Zayne

@MM, Thank you! I want to get back to my ADS routine again. For 6 months, I was doing daily 2-hour commutes each way, wearing the device to full-sting capacity. No pain, no gain!

R2 is in the bag! I\'m 10 days post right now, and sitting with:

FG upper-MS 5.5/5.6, lower-MS 5.5/5.4, BG 6.0/6.1
EG upper-MS 6.25, lower-MS 6.0, BG 7.0In general, I think I have lost .25\" since immediate post-op R2. For R1, I took half a benzo tab to rest my nerves, but for R2 I wanted to be awake and alert, especially because I had messed up the post-procedure instruction after R1, allowing retraction and massaging too aggressively. The result was what you see in my R1 pictures. For your sake, listen to Wade\'s instructions. Improvement can be made, but not perfectly, so gently spread the product evenly those first 48 hours and don\'t let your junk scrunch up.

The procedure itself was pleasant because of the usual banter. Wade is very conversational and engaging, and even Dr. C contributes interestingly to the topics. I probably should stay quiet and let them focus, but having your penis size increased is very euphoric.

I had spoke with Wade prior about the possibility of Kenalog injections, but they both assessed it was best to thread PMMA around the lumps so that it would all blend. So far, so go, but I hope there isn\'t a mastadon-lump waiting to reveal itself when the ice melts.

I received 18cc\'s @ 20%, and 2 cc\'s at 10% (base, which was already thick enough). Th photos speak for themselves.

Dr. C had had some extra time to discuss his views about metacrill, and he stated he preferred it because of it\'s better retentive quality. I asked him about using it in the face, and he didn't seem to lack any faith in it with that regard, either. Still, I pressed on about pricing of linnea safe, and he said there was no word on that yet. In terms, of the Girth, I don't know if it's the 20%, the metacrill, or both, but it's holding much longer than in R1. Also, I really like the feel of it so far.

The second photo looks even bigger in the mirror even though the pic is of a close-up! Looking pretty good 10 days out!

SO, Thanks for the words! I should clarify, those are actually Day #2. I\'ll post some as collagen starts. If there were 25%, I would have done it. The firmness gives a nice head-start to getting hard, but time will tell if that\'s just psychological effect of swollen size compared with pre-R2 appearance.

As far as the mirror-effect, my testicles tend to ride up the shaft, covering up length. The length is more obvious in the mirror because I cinch testicles backwards with finger. I do this typically, otherwise it could look shorter. I might look into something for this. I noticed in one of Sizemic\'s photos he\'s wearing a double-ring harnessing both the testicles and base of penis. I\'m looking for that.

Looks awesome Zayne!
Hopefully the great aesthetic continues to stay as the collagen starts to form.

jlmb, thank you! Gotta take minor lumpiness with a grain of salt, though.

Very good outcome indeed Zayne! Congratulations.

I find Dr C.\'s remark about Metacrill\'s better retentive quality very interesting. (tt has been mentioned already elsewhere in the forum). Still, NP was the routinely chosen product until supply run out ... the question is therefore back then which feature was compensating for lower retentive quality?

Thanks, Supa. I\'m in no place to comment about Dr. C\'s decision to choose NP, but I don\'t know if anyone realized Metacrill holds better until it was contrasted with NP after the switch. Anyways, when Linnea Safe is revealed, patients will have a choice to make -- maybe a difficult one, depending on factors.

We know that NP\'s beads are more regular in size than Metacrill\'s. However, since in the case of application to the penis the products are injected deep under the skin (ie limited risk of FBG) we may be should reconsider the trade-off \"regularity of beads vs optimized retention\". In the end, everything else equal, poor(er) retentive quality calls for more rounds thereby increasing FBG risk at the margin anyway.