TOPIC: KENT's Implant Progress Report

Also ...I just read the comment about stitching near the glans?? I have two very large very visible scars, but they are up on my abdomen. One was from the cut made to slide the implant down from above. The second scar is from where a large drainage tube was inserted to release fluid after the surgery. If Elist was making incisions near the glans in the past, then he absolutely must have changed techniques drastically, because there were no incisions on the outside skin of my penis made at any time! I NEVER NEVER would have agreed to allow anyone do that! To those who had Elist implants prior to 12.11, did your implant involve an incision near the glans? I am now very curious!

To answer your question....I thought \"Want More\", or \"Still Want More\" was from this site. Maybe he was on the PhalloBoards.com site. But we had a thread open, where we discussed the size of the prosthesis and the date he had his put in. What we did not discuss were the method or location of insertion, which for me as of 12.11 was way up on the abdomen. I don\'t know if \"Want More\" /s was done the same way or not?

KENT wrote: I have two very large very visible scars, but they are up on my abdomen. One was from the cut made to slide the implant down from above.

So he inserted the implant via your abdomen, and slid it down into your penis? Are you referring to the area above your penis (pubic area) or are you actually talking about your abdomen?

To answer your question...my incision is in between the base of the penis and the belly button....so yes.. pubic area would be more accurate, but it is pretty high up in this area. Oh and by the way..some of \"Want More\"/s posts (the other guy who is happy with his Elist implant) are on this site under the heading \"Elist Implant 5 days out\"...this thread was started by a third recipient of the implant who had his put in a little while after me. Hope that helps....\"Want More\" / s photos (which I can\'t currently find) were pretty impressive!

Take Care!

Androgen wrote: Kent, I am in no way doubting your procedure, or attempting to draw it into question. However I am curious, as your photos dont tend to match the photos of others who have undergone this procedure. Is Dr. Elist using some different method to attach or hold the implant near the glans? You have no stitching or markings near your glans like others have had. I also see no incision or stitching at the base. Granted it\'s been two months, your Sutures should be gone, but there would be a mark left behind. Has he gone to some new method where it\'s attached/implanted differently? Again I\'m not questioning your or the fact that you\'ve undergone this procedure, it\'s more of a question about the methods used during your procedure.

Andro, I agree with you that the pictures he posted on page 1 doesnt look like there is an implant in his penis. Also, if he had the implant in there, no way could he peel back his skin like he shows & only after 2 months............of course I am not trying to start anything either but pictures of the full penis in Flaccid state & also showing the scar where it was put in would be nice.
The pictures on page 1 look like pictures of before the implant, at least to me.

KENT wrote: Also ...I just read the comment about stitching near the glans?? I have two very large very visible scars, but they are up on my abdomen. One was from the cut made to slide the implant down from above. The second scar is from where a large drainage tube was inserted to release fluid after the surgery. If Elist was making incisions near the glans in the past, then he absolutely must have changed techniques drastically, because there were no incisions on the outside skin of my penis made at any time! I NEVER NEVER would have agreed to allow anyone do that! To those who had Elist implants prior to 12.11, did your implant involve an incision near the glans? I am now very curious!

Dr Elist never made an incision near the glands, he did some stitching around the glands somewhere.

I don\'t mean to insinuate anything, but KENT did you have a very disproportionate shaft-to-glans pre-op? Let me explain.
The glans in the photo are remarkably large, even so for a penis with an implant in it. If I were to imagine this shaft without an implant (which provides at least 1\" in Erect Girth), then your pre-op penis would have had a very disproportionate shaft-to-glans, was that the case?
I usually recommend 1 quality Before & After photo set, but we don\'t have that here. Two photos of what appears to be an Erect penis with a blur uncommon with today\'s photo technology. Could you provide us at least one quality before & after photo so that we can better see the implant\'s conformity to your shaft? When you can of course, thanks!

The fuzzy pictures are doing the OP a disservice, they are not convincing that there is an implant in. The taper is incorrect. May be better pix will put to rest any doubts?

Mustang2020 wrote: The fuzzy pictures are doing the OP a disservice, they are not convincing that there is an implant in. The taper is incorrect. May be better pix will put to rest any doubts?

Mustang is right, there is no taper where the implant should be & I still cant get over how someone can peel back the skin like that only 2 months after surgery with an implant supposedly in there.

This Kent guy hasnt responded in over 7 days, imo hes a shill.........

If that is the case, this one may be one of the better shills we have seen about the defunct silicone implant. Fairly smooth but as usual was not able to come up with real convincing pictures. The only way for another shill to be successful is to post some actual pictures of real patients but then the Dr\' office may be sued for privacy issues so we may not see another real implant patient for a while....

Again, if this guy is a shill....

I\'ll give him the benefit of the doubt. Like I said I wasn\'t trying to suggest anything negative, I just had questions as it seemed so much different from others experiences/pictures. Perhaps he can provide some solid picture proof and prove us all wrong, if not then my opinion will change.

Androgen wrote: I\'ll give him the benefit of the doubt. Like I said I wasn\'t trying to suggest anything negative, I just had questions as it seemed so much different from others experiences/pictures. Perhaps he can provide some solid picture proof and prove us all wrong, if not then my opinion will change.

Also, I want to see the name Kent written on a piece of paper next to he penis so we know he\'s not posting someone elses pictures.........im not falling for the oldest trick in the book.

@ JazzyJ I agree brah, spoon pics or it never happened.

KENT\'s progress report is becoming increasingly questionable. After reviewing both the content & photos of this thread, I have deemed it in potential violation of Rule (R7.), and the original poster (KENT) must furnish evidence (i.e. clear photos) proving the legitimacy of his claims.
Failure to do so can result in Removal of thread, and potential suspension/banishment.
KENT has 2 weeks for rebuttal & clarification. Please do service to your post, we all deserve to learn as much as we can about all options available. But in light of the fact that shilling has happened to this forum before, rest assured there is no tolerance for horse shit. Thanks.