TOPIC: Andy's uncircumcised PMMA log

Awesome results! I had my first round the previous day.

nice comparison picturestreak!
good good job taking starting pics Flaccid aswell!
looks good no doubt, if only PMMA had no risks... edit: (if only PMMA had less risks!)

what was your starting fg btw ?

where is the errected comparison picturestreak, from birds eye view

aestheticgirth wrote: looks good no doubt, if only PMMA had no risks...

I\'m not sure there could ever be a method completely without risk...ever.

@Andy
Great comparison shots!

Skeptical One wrote: I\'m not sure there could ever be a method completely without risk...ever.

Of course \"completely without risk\" was obviously not what i meant, but less risks, such as necrosis, Foreign Body Granuloma, that have to be removed and can leave a completely unaesthetic penis. And even lifethreatening ones as Doctors state about pmma (linked in my signature&riskthread, reader who is not registered ; ) ), and as we have read about in at least one public practical case. lasercenter.posterous.com/plastic-surger...-beauty-queen-dies-a
(of course diffrent body region/amount, just as the example of the possibility)

Correction of my above saying: If only PMMA was safe enough to be FDA approved in the USA. So not every plastic surgeon or dermatologist would have to say to us \"stay clear of it\".

Still unclear how you could missinterpret my above post, but not worth discusing either to me.

peace

It is FDA approved.

not off lable (not for all body areas) such as butt or penis injection.

aestheticgirth wrote: not off lable (not for all body areas) such as butt or penis injection.

You don\'t need approval for off label use. There would be no advantage to the companies making these product to go through the expense of having the same product passed for uses in different areas. Getting FDA approval isn\'t cheap and off label use is perfectly legal. Also they had to change the carrier to make Artefil sufficiently different to other PMMA products in order to obtain a patent. Thus there was no point testing it elsewhere as the carrier isn\'t suitable.

You miss the point why i responded to SO comment. And new plastic/metacrill (the PMMA brands used for most users here) is not FDA approved.

No there are will never be any treatment that is without risk (totally new news), but that doesnt mean that we have/should to take the PMMA risk (NewPlastic/Metacrill is meant here, thank you) now. Which of course has not been said like this.
When clearly all the Doctors are advising against any use of it.

It seems to me like hair-splittnig is beeing done here to defend the injections.
When only a forum user is not fully joining the cheerleading towards the procedure.

I agree andy. While I am appreciative of aestheticsgirth\'s and others efforts to inform us of the risks inherent with PMMA, I believe the point has been made and that your PR belongs to you. I ask that no member posts about any other topic not related to andy\'s progress. Thank you andy for your update! Things are looking good and I wish you the best!

Regards,

M7

PROCEDURE 2 - WEEK 2

Everything going really well. Sitting around 5.75\" Flaccid and 6\" MSEG (6.5\" at base), so up 0.5\" as at same time after first procedure. Got some great comments and reactions - can\'t believe the difference from the beginning to now.

Dude that thing is enormous! I hope things are shaping up nicely.

Speechless. Congrats Andy! You may need to check your local zoning laws cause that thing is H-U-G-E! Aesthetics are great. As Billy Crystal once said, \"You look marvelous!\" Congrats buddy.

wow man. that is quite a transformation. i hate to sound repetative of the other comments, but that thing is huge! massive. congrats.

andy wrote: PROCEDURE 2 - WEEK 2

Everything going really well. Sitting around 5.75\" Flaccid and 6.5\" MSEG, so up 0.5\" as at same time after first procedure. Got some great comments and reactions - can\'t believe the difference from the beginning to now.

Wow, one of the best before & afters I\'ve seen in a while!