TOPIC: PMMA & Foreskin: Problem and Solution (?)

This is completely unrelated to Dreams post but I just thought I\'d give everyone my opinion on Foreskin restoration.
Basically if you plan on doing it don\'t expect a huge increase in sensation, it obviously might improve a fraction, but not much.
I had a partial Circumcision and still have have half a Foreskin yet I\'ve lost almost all the sensation, I really don\'t think when I have the rest of it removed il lose anymore sensation because I\'ve already lost most of it, I think the tip of the Foreskin is the most sensitive part, and Foreskin restoration just involves stretching the shaft skin which isn\'t that sensitive to begin within.
I can completely see how how Foreskin resto would give you a psychological boost if your unhappy with having a short Foreskin or with being Circumcised, and obviously in Dreams case it might be beneficial for his PMMA procedure.

Now this sounds terrible - Dr C recommends only one Round for uncircumsized guys. Because Foreskin movement fucks up PMMA in the first 3 days or something.

Dr N doesn\'t even ask if you are uncircumsized, i think she assumes you are because it\'s europe and basically everybody is. And her standard she sells is 3 rounds with 30% (although less ml than Dr C).

Pictures of guys who had PMMA with foreskins:

- california35:
Has foreskin that in flaccid state really goes over whole penis.
I wonder if it went over the whole penis also in the whole swollen state.
I guess this would be very good - i think only rolled down foreskins that sit under the penishead are the problem (on the other hand, when one is erect in first 3 days, then foreskin will go to this area, so the problem is there also).

In his case, he had a special effect: when hard, now the foreskin sometimes goes forward over the head - because his shaft is bigger. I guess this can only happen when the forehead stays over the had in the days when pmma forms.

In erect picture foreskin area is tighter, and after it the thickness starts. I think it looks goood.

phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/1-r...ue-8118409?&trail=45
phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/1-r...ue-8118409?&trail=60

- southdub:
Picture shows foreskin after procedure and in swollen state was over the penis (and swollen).
End result to me looks excellent.

phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/sou...78835?pid=1294498048
phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/sou...-n-8378835?&trail=45
phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/sou...-n-8378835?&trail=60

- number 22:
After round 3 something weird/bad happened - did pmma get downside in the foreskin area underneath the penis?
phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/num...-n-8173998?&trail=60

- Heimdall
In swelling stage foreskin goes over penishead.
Looks great. Also just one round.
phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/my-...ue-8418115?&trail=15

-thebeast
Small foreskin.
When swollen, foreskin went over the head.
phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/fin...16681?pid=1293168405

- Shergar
Erect in swollen state the usual foreskin of course under penishead and pressing in, after that more thickness. Still looks great to me. Had 3 rounds.
phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/she...-n-6922633?&trail=15
phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/she...-n-6922633?&trail=60




Conclusion:
I guess with foreskin you cannot place pmma as near at the penishead as you can.
This is not ideal, but can still be an aestethically good result.

My foreskin is in a way it coveres about half my penishead, i guess it\'s an atypically short foreskin.

Now when being swollen, my foreskin did not go over my penishead - it was \'stuffed\' before the penishead. I think this was universal to foreskin-guys. But as seen here: It seems everybody else had foreskin over the penishead when swollen.

Most had just one round. (for money reasons or one was not so happy)


I am kinda thinking if i keep going 10% with low doses nothing too bad can happen
(which probably is not totally true, but still)

You contribute a lot to this forum. Respect to you.

Thanks!

Dream wrote: - Idea of Solution to the problem:
Put a wrap on that fixes the foreskin to the penishead
Put it on before the procedure.
1. Foreskin gets compressed and cannot fill up with fluid
2. Foreskin does not bundle up in the area before the penishead and press inward

Problem solved!
?

Challenges:
1. How to do this wrap? In the picture I just took adhesive tape. What are better ways?
2. Removing it and putting a new one back on after every erection ' which one should have. So ' eg hourly erection pauses?
Biggest problem: Erections in sleep
It sounds not feasible at night? Which makes it not feasable at all?

An alternative to wrapping could be something that 'hangs' the foreskin and pulls on it?
Is there anything out there?
For guys eg trying to regrow their foreskin?

Omg, i just found something here by accident - Restoration linked to it!

It\'s right here:
tlctugger.com/tlc-tugger/


It basically fixates the foreskin to the glans
Exactly what i looked for it seems

tlctugger.com/product/tlc-tugger-kit

It can also eventually be worn at night, they ask for flaccid and erect width of glans (one can just send pictures with ruler)
It can also be a \'stretcher\'. (Therefore it could also be stretched upward, perhaps that is even better for less fluid to get into foreskin)


So the idea is:
1. Put it on before the operation.
Ok, that\'s probably not good. Probably Dr N is not used to it and you cannot really see where glands begin.
Perhaps speak with Dr N about it. I guess she is used to it, because she does guys who have totally much foreskin that covers the whole glands. So i guess she can see everything.

2. Put it on right after the operation
Idea is that the bundled up foreskin right below the glans does not press all the pmma downwards. Like in my case.
Also: It presses foreskin together, so i guess no fluid can gather there.


What do you think?

This reminds me of an idea I had last year to perfect post-pmma results. phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/pmm...96078?pid=1293001777

The responses were fair. If the catheter component is removed, and the unit is removed for urination, breaks and sleep, it may work.

I now bought

www.foreskinrestore.com/weight_method.html

But: it\'s up to 8 weeks delivery, but my next pmma date is in 7 weeks, so this sucks.
I guess i can just hope for arrival eg after 6 weeks.

Ok, this thread is very important, i have to look at it:

phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/pmm...32228?pid=1294141423

It seems when uncut there is a lot of change from non-erect to erect.

camphallo wrote: I had my first round of PMMA uncircumcised and it looked great when I was flaccid, but when erect and the foreskin pulled back you will get a big and unnatural looking bulge at the base.
If you get PMMA after circumcision, your unit will have the \"Pigs in a blanket\" look (as Reklaw mentioned), but it will look thick and natural when erect.
So take your pick. If you want to look \'natural\' when flaccid then don\'t get circumcised. If you want the opposite (and get more than one round) than get circumcised first.

Southdub wrote: So. I think i begin to get it. If you are a shower it is probably better to be circumcised. because when you become erect and your foreskin roles back under glans it will lead to a build up at the base as the shaft has not increased enough in length to spread out the moved foreskin evenly. But if your are a grower it is probably better not to be circumcised as the extra shaft length when erect will help spread out the foreskin when it roles back under the glans.

camphallo wrote: Ok, I dug up some of my old pics from before I got my circ.

picture 1
Immediately before the procedure in Jon 2016.

picture 2
The night after the procedure.

picture 3
Erect pic a couple of months after. Note the foreskin behind the glans and the bulge near the base and the bulge gets bigger the more you pull the skin back.

It may not look so bad, but if someone is giving you a handy ,he/she is bound to notice something is not natural here.

Like Dr C says in the video.

With a lot of foreskin the flaccid to me looks perfect. Also others i have seen.
But with the erect in this case there is a lot of movement the skin. With foreskin the skin moves a lot, and somehow the pmma here moves with it.


My foreskin is kinda very small foreskin, i looked it up in foreskin restoration forum and it\'s atypical. I am kinda in the middle between foreskin and no-foreskin it seems.
Now my idea with the upper apparatus in the post before was to put in on in the pmma procedure, so foreskin doesn\'t badge up behind my glans. So she can put pmma more closer to my glans.
Now i am not so sure anymore if this would be good. Perhaps it leads to more problems when being erect.

Wheee! I\'m famous!

BTW, I just got back from a third round last Sunday. I\'m now Circumcised of course.

Hi!
After round 2 you did Circumcision with Dr C?
How is the whole experience and how happy are you

Ok, you wrote

I got cut as an adult and I think it was the best thing for me. I like the look and feel. When I still had Foreskin. I would always feel \'wet\' when the skin covered the glans and I hated that.

No, I had my circ done by a Dr in NYC.

It was relatively painless and I really glad that I had it done. I love the look.

5 days later...

Flacid




About 75% Erect

O, i just had a little Aha-Effect perhaps

That: Having my Foreskin back (not over the penishead) is good.
Because: If i have my Foreskin forced to the front, and then get PMMA, and then far later the Foreskin gets pulled back - then the PMMA is pulled back with it. At least that\'s how it was in the video form Avanti above.
So better have it back like i do now.

ps i guess i stop pumping because i guess it enlarges my Foreskin somehow, making it less tight, i guess this is a known effect.

Hm,

a question:
Do doctors put PMMA further upwards on cut penisses than on uncut penisses?