Hi Everyone,
My brain is starting to hurt already.
I would say that 90%+ of doctors injecting dont understand the ins and outs of rheology (science of fluids)for fillers. When I started there was none. And I still only have a basic functional grasp.
There are lots of factors that interact and overlap. Sometimes what you think might be the most important then turns out not to be. And each company then only reports certain elements of their products and if they do a comparison they only publish things that show their product in a good light and if their product does not do well in that test it goes to the bottom draw. No one ever comes to me and says \"look my product is not that great, we skimp on the safety/production values and we want to charge you a fortune for it!\"
(I got caught up and not finished this post for a few days....)
The article posted is useful but limited and a bit old.
Restylane/Perlane are the type of filler where the gel is cut up by the sieves into little bricks and made to be injectable by having some uncrosslinked
HA. The Juvederm range are all \'monophasic\' smooth gels. These seem to have \'won\' and even the maker of
Restylane has come out with a smooth gel too - Emerval.
I really dont know what is best. I am about to start work with a Phd researcher and try and get some published papers on the
Calibre procedure. Then maybe we can get some industry support for more trials. I think this is a huge new area for the filler manufacturers - doubling the % of the population who have fillers (ie adding men) and them having 2 - 5/ as much per year. They should be lining up!