Sincerely thanks to everyone who\'s chimed in on this site\'s behalf.
What\'s ultimately lost in all of this is how in the end, this is my site and I can turn it into whatever I please. Like if I so-choose, this website will become a forum on pets, and we can discuss the whole dog vs cat thing. This sense of entitlement baffles me.
But I have obviously not chosen that route. I address things with Moderators who\'s opinions I value. I made this decision, and the monetary side of this site does not involve the other Moderators, only myself. And I have a simple reasoning behind why I provide Commercial Accounts. If & when (presumably) scrupulous and ethical physicians join our forum, we have no issue with it (example: Dr.
Oates). But if they get to post freely, they are indirectly (or arguably even directly) advertising at this forum\'s expense. Given the audience they can reach in such a niche field, why wouldn\'t I collect for their \"banner\" space? So according to you, lengthordeath, this forum who really appreciates Dr.
Oates input should just let him advertise freely? Yes, the membership system was to help fund the site while simultaneously avoiding the \"pop-up ad\" route. However, that doesn\'t mean that commercial interests can post here freely. This especially occurred to me when Dr.
Oates reception was so good. Finally a no-B.S. medical professional joining the discussion. Everyone seemed to really benefit from the conversation.
Furthermore, the Commercial Account is afforded one \"virtual ad\"...it is just that, an ad. Can it be criticized, questioned, scrutinized, etc? Sure, start a thread in the General
Phalloplasty Discussion and have at it. The idea that Moderators don\'t endorse or verify claims made by Commercial Accounts specifically apply to the virtual ad space, not actual discussion threads. I thought that was obvious, but I guess not. This is a hypothetical example: say Dr. Giunta wants to put up his own advertisement in the appropriate sub-forum. He can say you\'ll gain 2\" x 2\" all he wants, because it\'s simply that, an ad. That doesn\'t mean we can\'t discuss the legitimacy of his claims in the appropriate forums. You can highlight the absurdity of the claim and demand the doctor back up the claims found in his ad all you\'d like. I make it very clear that these are sponsors and advertisements, if you have half a brain, you should be skeptical with any claims made. The great thing is, after reading an advertisement, you can actually search reviews of actual people having actual procedures done to determine how credible advertisement claims are.
And yes, there is a blacklist. There are physicians & clinics I will refuse to take any $$ from. I denied a handsome sum by
Androfill when I could have tolerated their shilling attempts and turned a blind eye. There are physicians right now that I wont even return a correspondence to if they inquired about acquiring ad-space. So thanks, thanks a lot for comparing this site\'s endeavor to SLE 2.0. You\'ve made a fan out of me.
But really, this is coming from a guy who\'s been registered for less than 3 months when this forum has been here 6 years. We\'ve been through and seen a lot. Not sure you really value the bigger picture. I\'ve bent over backwards for this forum, tell me lengthordeath, what obligation do I have to maintain or keep this forum running? I\'m serious, please answer this question. I really have no interest in any other exchange until you can give me a damn good answer to this question. And an extension to this question, who do any of these Moderators feel the need to give and give? I know all of them to have taken phone calls (presumably at no cost, when their consultation is priceless), answered countless PMs & emails, and still stick around for guys like you. So answer these 2 questions please.
This kind of thread really ought to be in the Feedback Forum but I\'ll let it stay here for as much \"transparency\" (i.e. remaining visible) as we can offer.