Hi, I\'ve been lurking through this website for quite some time, trying to figure out what might be best for me. All that I can come up with is I have no idea. Seemingly there are guys who have had positive results with these procedures, and then guys who have had absolute nightmares. From what I have heard it seems that Dr. C or Dr.N are the two front runners for this experimental type procedure. I say experimental because everybody is different and each person will experience different results with these procedures based on their anatomy and response to a foreign substance being introduced into their body.
Like most of the people on this website I have many questions. I have heard a lot of talk about the percentage of PMMA used in sessions with clients. It seems to me that a lot of the people that have opted for 30% PMMA have had a lot of complications. However on the flip side I\'m not sure that I\'ve heard of a patient having one or multiple sessions of 10% having the issues that the folks doing the 30% procedures are having.
In all reality I dont know much about all this. To be honest I\'d love to be able to do a procedure because I am on the short end of things as well as on the thin side of them too. Its not a new thing for me, but as much as I hate how small and thin my Dick is, I like it aesthetically. If I could improve it without ruining it, I\'d be all in, but Dick enhancement isnt like putting a set of silicone bags into someones chest, PMMA is dynamic in that it is just something where you have to let the chips fall where they may. And that is a scary proposition, every persons account will be different.
I\'d like to know if there are any people in this thread who have only had 10% through their whole experience and if that has been different than the people who have had 20% and 30%
for their procedures.
You should buy a membership and go back and look at a lot of the progress reports. Briceb has also done a really fabulous job looking at 10% vs 30% with respect to gains. You can only see that though with the membership, if I am correct. Smalljay seems quite right. 10% does seem to be the way to go if you care a lot about aesthetics. Your decision for 10 vs 30 is obviously going to be dependent upon your desires for outcome.
Shanker you seems to have been in the same situation as me regarding your Dick, why not try HA as a reversible solution art least to start with. You would then probably now better if you are willing to.take the risk of a permanant difformity
So let me get this straight.
Are you saying, that 10% vs 30%,
10% make for less Girth, but looks better, 30% is more Girth but, not as natural looking? Aww. & whats the difference between the Linnea and the Metacrill, besides the price?