TOPIC: Against Phalloboards?

I don\'t get what you mean?

... and put our SO to aspersion and shame! Sshhhiiiitt ...

I posted this crappy link to show our transparency, to prove there is no illicit purposes here in this site.

A shame indeed! I feel so sad and disappointed that such a thread should even exist. Not good for \"passers by\". Shall we vote whether to expunge it (though its existence is good to show transparency in the board)?

Toolman wrote:

I\'ve met both Skeptical One and Wade over the same weekend, and they are definitely not the same person, nor does Wade post on this site.

Hope you and your wife are doing well. Thanks for the clarification, a damn shame such a thing is even needed.

hoddle10 wrote: Also if Skeptical One is definitely Wade, then explain his posting on Thundersplace for several years before starting this forum. I\'ve still got PM\'s on Thundersplace where I tell him not to get the Eliist implant. My posting on Thundersplace goes back to 2003 and prior to that I was on the old PEforums and was a member of the yahoo group back when Dan Le Treen (sp?) was running it in the late 90\'s.

I\'ve met both Skeptical One and Wade over the same weekend, and they are definitely not the same person, nor does Wade post on this site.

totally off topic but isn\'t it ridiculous how the editorial of that review site can\'t stand to see the word penis so they have to asterix out its offensiveness. good to see the guardians of our consumer behaviour also do a strong sideline in morals too.

anyway...

^
^
^
This

I\'m a relative newbie to these forums, so I don\'t know anything about who is who, but what I do know is that Rip off Report is dedicated to outing product/service providers for bad product/service, meaning that you have to have had an actual purchase from said product/service provider. Without that, this posting is entirely slanderous. The poster shows no facts, just shares his/her opinion, even admits to it. However, that website is not for opinions, it is for actual offenders. The owner(s) of this forum have an easy claim for post Removal.

Yes, I remember SO under the name (at Mynewsize)...\"To gain or not\" -

I am with you guys. I was a member of Thunder\'s Place for 6 years and read Skeptikal One under other username years ago. But I think it is important to be aware and share these crappy links here to prove we are humble and not bitches with obscure purposes.

It\'s slightly comical that he\'s tryna say Sceptical One is Wade but at the same time it infuriates me that their trying to discredit this forum which is the only reliable source of information in the world for p.e.

Well, the one downside about the Internst is that anybody can post anything ....
Members on this board know that we are legitimate....I have been on the PE boards since 2009 (a greenhorn compared to Hoddle but still a relatively long period) and
Know that Skeptical One, Hoddle, Miracle, and the rest of the core members are basically selfless contributors to the PE community.
In fact, this board was created in response to all the manipulative PE sites, which are loaded with sharks and misinformation.

Also if Skeptical One is definitely Wade, then explain his posting on Thundersplace for several years before starting this forum. I\'ve still got PM\'s on Thundersplace where I tell him not to get the Eliist implant. My posting on Thundersplace goes back to 2003 and prior to that I was on the old PEforums and was a member of the yahoo group back when Dan Le Treen (sp?) was running it in the late 90\'s.

It\'s either written by Chad Hedman or Dan Salas, most probably Chad. Chad posted on here once claiming that Dr C had had a attack which wasn\'t true and also that Wade had sexually assaulted a patient, hence I suspect he is more likely to be behind this than Dan. Also Chad uses web optimisation for his board and the \"report\" mentions the use of it.