TOPIC: Linnea verses MetaCrill

He also seems to offer additional aftercare since I had my procedures. It makes sense that he has to charge more just for the extra time and hassle.

briceb wrote:

Girthseeker wrote: Exactly , but I doubt he will because he\'s all about the money which is why the price of round 1 has doubled since this procedure has become somewhat popular

These kind of comments always make me mad. People get mad that the price of a service or item is in demand increases. They act like the person providing the service should do for nothing. This is how the free market works. I am sure your boss would love to pay you half of what you get now, but if you could swing getting paid double for the same job, you would take it.

Fixed supply and excess demand means that the price of the good or service should increase until the two equal. Basic economics. Anyone not employing this in their business is not optimizing it. You can\'t really criticize someone for doing that.

Is Dr. C\'s service the \"baragin\" it once was? No. But you can\'t really criticize him for adjusting his prices to meet demand.

Not only is the demand higher, he also seems to be the leading doctor in this procedure. Many doctors try, but few have the success of Dr C. At least that\'s what I\'ve seen. If that is the case, Dr C has the most experience and is probably arguably the best doctor around. With more experience and knowledge, Dr C is worth more than others. Not to mention, I absolutely love by big fat Cock and would have paid more if it had cost more.

Most people are fine with pricing. People will pay almost anything for a larger penis, hence that is why the price has nearly doubled since this website started. Even though the product is dirt cheap.. $2-4 a ml. yet they are charging $2800 for 20ml. They know it\'s an inelastic good that no one else is selling so that is why the price keeps rising. Don\'t worry about the difference. They are both plastic beads made from oil essentially. You should read this entire forum before posting questions that have been answered to death

I think you should learn more before you jump into PMMA.

That doesnt really answer his question about the diff between the 2. I have the same question but I emailed Wade about it so just waiting for a response.

From the FAQ:

Q. What is the difference between Linnea Safe and Metacrill?

A. They are both PMMA-based gels for use in bioplasty (enlargement of penile Girth, diminishing wrinkles, augmenting cheeks, etc...). The non-PMMA based ingredients vary between the two products. Both products contain microscopic PMMA beads that trigger an immune reaction from the body that will cause you to produce collagenous tissue that walls off the product, in a 1-2 month period after implantation. The PMMA does not dissolve but the other ingredients leave the body within 3-5 days. Results and reputation of the products vary as well. Linnea Safe is more expensive. The ingredients are below:

Linnea SafePMMAHydroxycellulosePropylparabenMethylparaenWater MetacrillCarboxymethylcelluloseMagnesium Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt dehydrate (Titriplex magnesium)PMMACalcium gluconateLactated Ringer\'s solution

Thanks resto. Wade just emailed me back and said the Linnea was more viscous and better for patients because its easier to mold. I am wondering how true that is or if its just a up-sale over the metacrill.

This is clearly something we\'re gonna have to take some time to see results for , this could be the same product with a new name to get more of ya money or it could actually be a better option or maybe it could even be a fucked up version that doesn\'t hold up as well . We don\'t know yet

Dr. C said LS was also easier to inject... which is weird if it\'s the thicker one. But, maybe it\'s something else about it that makes it easier to inject. Or, maybe he meant it was easier to keep it in place then - since it\'s thicker and won\'t run.

Dr. Lemperle\'s email seemed to suggest they\'re the same...but he was more focused on trying to help with my Nodule, so the context wasn\'t totally about that.

If I had LS in round 1, I may not have had the reaction I did in R3... I have no idea what caused that. I only had 15 cc of 30% LS.

If Linnea Safe is truly the better option, the practice should discontinue the use of Metacrill simply for aesthetic purposes and overall patient satisfaction.

Exactly , but I doubt he will because he\'s all about the money which is why the price of round 1 has doubled since this procedure has become somewhat popular

SpankAss wrote: Thanks resto. Wade just emailed me back and said the Linnea was more viscous and better for patients because its easier to mold. I am wondering how true that is or if its just a up-sale over the metacrill.

I just want to point out that when I asked about pushing my appointment back a few weeks because they were getting Linnea Safe in, and I thought it was the better choice. Wade emailed me back, and his response was that they were the same. No mention of being easier to inject and manipulate. So who knows.

Don\'t trust these guys..

Big Ben, Don\'t trust who?

Girthseeker wrote: Exactly , but I doubt he will because he\'s all about the money which is why the price of round 1 has doubled since this procedure has become somewhat popular

These kind of comments always make me mad. People get mad that the price of a service or item is in demand increases. They act like the person providing the service should do for nothing. This is how the free market works. I am sure your boss would love to pay you half of what you get now, but if you could swing getting paid double for the same job, you would take it.

Fixed supply and excess demand means that the price of the good or service should increase until the two equal. Basic economics. Anyone not employing this in their business is not optimizing it. You can\'t really criticize someone for doing that.

Is Dr. C\'s service the \"baragin\" it once was? No. But you can\'t really criticize him for adjusting his prices to meet demand.