Hey guys. I am muscular built guy with large thighs and this tends to make my penis look very small. I am 4\"x5 flaccid but after activity or cold weather I really shrink up to about 3.5x4. My avatar is me pumped which is how I have lived my life for the past 5 years to avoid embarrassment after the gym or at nude events. Pumped I can stay at 5-5.3x6 for most of the day. Locker rooms have always been difficult as I feel my penis does not match the strong appearance of the rest of my body. I have always hated how small my penis looks flaccid and it has plagued me for years!! To top it off my wife and I are nudists and we visit areas where I obviously feel very inadequate if I don\'t pump before! My erect stats are nothing special but not small, I am 6.3x5.7 and BPEL 7x5.7. Most women have said I am big. Anyways this is not the issue, I do not look big flaccid!! Long story short my wife, bless her knows how much this bugs me and she said she would support me in whatever I wanted to do. She said she would even go to Tijuana with me!! She had small breasts and got DD\'s so I think she feels my pain!
On to my question. Given the green light by my wife I am a little scared to go through with PMMA. What are the biggest negatives currently presented by PMMA? How many treatments do they generally have to perform to make it look right? I do not want to be over 6.5 width, I think this would be too thick, how many cc\'s given my current stats would that be? Essentially to the much more knowledgeable than me what are the most common current problems with this product? Can this procedure be reversed or removed? I really want this surgery and my wife \"really\"wants me to get to but I almost feel pressured by her. I don\'t want to do anything that I will regret. Really just want to be well informed. I very, very much appreciate the help! This forum is amazing!!
Thank you so much! BTW the picture is my avatar which is what I would want to go for using PMMA, that is me pumped which I think looks just right.
If you go to nudist places, you will definitely want to avoid that for awhile after PMMA. Flaccid shows all the imperfections. Those may settle out after time but maybe not. Only the very lucky ones have no issues with Flaccid look. IMO, with the size you already are, and that you are frequently naked in front of people, you should think long and hard about PMMA, and read many progress threads. Best of luck and welcome to the boards.
I\'m always a bit confused by these people claiming a big reason for their inadequacy is their Flaccid size, and then they post a WELL above average Flaccid size. Even 4x5 should put you in the 90% percentile. 4 inches long Flaccid is 82.8% percentile according to howlongismyschlong.com (which uses 3 studies results), and there isn\'t a Flaccid Girth percentile, but considering 5 inches is 70% Erect percentile, I\'d assume thats near 95% or higher Flaccid percentile.
So if thats what your problem is, you are waaaay above average. Maybe the problem is how you perceive it in the locker room. Looking down at your own Dick normally makes it seem smaller, when in reality, others may be perceiving it as much bigger.
I realize you pumped in that pic, but it looks very thick...even next to your legs in the pic. Also, just FYI there\'s no guarantee at all that PMMA will give you the look you have in the pic. You can\'t really pump after PMMA either (just do a search for it on the site - it\'s not recommended). With 5.7 EG and 4-5 FG, there\'s no real need for this. I had one round, and after 3 months, my Flaccid length was the same - though Girth was maybe 1/4-1/2\" bigger. Big deal. I\'m still smaller than you are & I really don\'t care that much. Here are your questions and my personal opinions.
Given the green light by my wife I am a little scared to go through with PMMA. What are the biggest negatives currently presented by PMMA?
No clear way to predict growth. Lumps, unevenness, and injection site nodules. Long term (over 10 year) results unknown. Foreign body reactions and granuloma potential.
How many treatments do they generally have to perform to make it look right?
Some can just do 1.. most do 2. Then you might start trading old problem for new problems. With 5.7 to start, you shouldn\'t need more than 2. Even 1 would probably be enough if you made sure to keep up your aftercare so your aesthetics were good.
I do not want to be over 6.5 width, I think this would be too thick, how many cc\'s given my current stats would that be?
Probably 20cc of 30% would get you anywhere from 6.0 to 6.7. Hard to predict. 20cc 10% would get you to 6.0-6.3 probably.
Can this procedure be reversed or removed?
Only with very invasive and costly surgery that may damage some sensation. It will require a lot of dissection of the penile skin. We only have 1 report of it, and he\'s doing fine, but I think he got lucky the surgeon was extremely meticulous. Search for the user \"Darkstaff\" and read his log.
I really want this surgery and my wife \"really\"wants me to get to but I almost feel pressured by her.
You\'re already significantly over average in Girth. What is she expecting? Have you used 6.5\" Girth dildos so she knows what\'s gonna happen? Anyway, careful about doing anything risky to your own body for someone else. If it goes badly, that\'s a recipe for relationship probs. Once it is in your body - it\'s gonna be there forever...thats one major reason to avoid it if you\'re 5.7 eg.
I personnely believe, based on what you have wrote, that there will be a high probability that you will not be happy with any procedure. Unless you don\'t mind less than perfect results to show everyone at a nude rally. The reason you don\'t get an absolute consensus about any procedure is that they have so many variables on out comes. You will never know for sure until the procedure is completed. If you did move ahead with PMMA I would recommend 10% at lower volumes to give you the best chance for good results that will look the most natural. Btw welcome
Brownbomber wrote: Thanks brice. It\'s very hard to come to a consensus on this site because there so many conflicting opinions. Also a few look great and a lot bad. Looks like I may have to tear this post down and structure my questions differently. I am mainly concerned with tissue hardening, granunolas and tapering/ring.
They are all possible. We aren\'t going to be able to tell you if you would encounter any of those problems or how you\'d react if you did or the impact it would have on your life. We can\'t even give you anything more than semi educated guess\'s as to the likelihood of any of those things happening. Ultimately they are the kind of things you can\'t really research as there is no long term data of this filler being used in the penis.
I think you need to research what the implications of granulomas might be and then discuss with your wife if you think it\'s worth the unquantifiable risk.
Thanks brice. It\'s very hard to come to a consensus on this site because there so many conflicting opinions. Also a few look great and a lot bad. Looks like I may have to tear this post down and structure my questions differently. I am mainly concerned with tissue hardening, granunolas and tapering/ring.
I would suggest taking the time to read several of the other progress reports and other threads. You will find the answers to the majority of your questions.
Yes, there is a lot of information on here to read, and it will take some time, but like you said, you want to be well informed.
The circ scar gap is definitely more visible when Flaccid. If you have low circ scar may not be issue. Any uneven areas also more apparent when Flaccid from what I have seen and even with the minimal gains I got you can definitely see the lumps and circ scar gap Flaccid.