Musky wrote: 1000\'s of US plastic surgeons, dermatologists and urologists won\'t inject PMMA. That is not an insignificant factor. The US has many of the finest doctors, medical schools and researchers in the world. Mexico is not known for its medical advances... The lack of consensus by first world doctors that PMMA is safe means that there has not been enough research. I agree that the injection of olive oil was foolish.it likely was not sterile so he injected bacteria into his penis which would explain chronic inflammation. PMMA, properly handled, is sterile.
You kidding me? An effective & permanent
Dermal Filler would be the end of the cash cow that is the American Cosmetic Market. These doctors thrive on repeat clients to \"sustain\" their \"treatments\" every 6-12 months or so, continuously bringing in $$. Further, due to
PMMA\'s permanency, many of these doctors prefer shying away because if problems do arise, they are considerably harder to reverse/remove. This isn\'t an indictment against
PMMA by American doctors as a whole necessarily. And remarkably, there have been physicians reported here to have had little-to-no knowledge of the efficacy or mechanism behind
PMMA. And as a matter of fact,
PMMA (Artefill) is approved for facial filler in the U.S.
I hope that those who choose not to undergo
PMMA do so because they realize that they don\'t have any real size issue, and that the current \"experimental\" state of
Phalloplasty doesn\'t justify pursuing such risky endeavors. No one is denying that there aren\'t any risks, but as Miracle7x6.5 points out clearly, no medical procedure is without risk.