Willtravel wrote: Hello all
This thread is to basically get an opinion on which type of penis looks better after PMMA. Circumcised or not?
i am uncut, and after 30ccs of 30% metacril when the skin is not pulled back it looks and feels natural. even when Erect. Its only when i pull the skin back that you\'d notice i\'d had anything done. Especially now i have had a bigger amount. it clumps up and doesnt look bad, just not natural
When i see the pictures for the cut guys, imo it looks much better. Especially when Erect. Do the cut guys have similar problems? Or do you have different but equally valid problems.
Discuss
Sorry if this is slightly off topic, but a natural look post-op (for any PE procedure) is more often rare than not. Think about boob jobs... you can usually spot them right? And when you can\'t spot them, you think, damn that doctor was good. But generally speaking, they are almost always detectable to some extent. This is no different than enlarging one\'s penis. The glans will dwarf, the shaft\'s palpabality may be noticeably different, and there could be traces of cosmetic work (i.e. ridges, lumps, nodules, etc).
The reason I\'m throwing this out there with respect to the topic is that I\'m not sure being cut or uncut will significantly improve one\'s odds for a more natural look, and if there was a difference, I\'m willing to bet it\'s negligible.
It would be nice for our uncut and cut members to chime in.