I had lengthening and Girth with Giunta 3 weeks ago. My Flaccid size increased by a lot, which is what i wanted. i finally feel comfortable in my own skin! that alone was worth all the $$ and hassle.
pre-surgery Flaccid was a 1.5\" baby Dick ( just under 3\" when fully relaxed, after 6 months stretching. but it was usually under 2\".)
post-surgery is now over 4\" most times, and near 4.4\" when relaxed. i look and feel \"normal\" now.
no Erect length gain - yet.
i thought i had actually lost Erect length, but realized my pubic fatpad area was really swollen, and there is a hard lump under the suture that is slowly getting smaller. my \"usable Erect length went from 5\", to 4.8\" and is slowly coming back to 5\" as i\'m healing and the scar tissue is softening.
The Dr. was very upfront with me, that there would be ZERO Erect gain without stretching, but the lig cut may allow me to gain where previously i did not. (6 months stretching, PE, light Hanging, with no gain pre lig cut).
If you\'re after Flaccid gains, then 100% do it.
If you only want Erect gains, definitely try to gain without a dr.
I won\'t know if the doc \"unlocked\" some Erect length, until after my stretching program. Here goes another 6 months...
What about the angle and and the \"standing\" of your Dick hasnt it changed in some way ?
Didnt the lig cut procedure used to be adressed as total shit that makes your Dick
stand weaker and in some cases made sex permanently painfull, unenjoyable and even cause loss of some EL. Thats how i remeber my research about this procedure.
Is the Flaccid gain garanteed even without pre op streching Hanging ?
KFH wrote: Having had Ligamentolysis very recently, I\'d concur sentiment that if you only after Flaccid length gain, then it\'s a good procedure to go for.
My Erection is still painful, after 31 days. Oddly my Erection is stronger and more acute (towards abdomen) but I believe this to be the discomfort making my penis constantly tense.
Flaccid gain is pretty much guaranteed, but it obviously depends on what your pre-measurements are. I was 3.5\"NPB and now I\'m 4\"NPB. The smaller the penis, the more dramatic the gain in length.
I know your surgeon told you that, but I don\'t think there is any evidence to support that at all. In fact Mr Viel in London claimed the opposite in an FHM article. Flaccid length gains are entirely dependant on how much the angle changes after release of the ligs. A higher angle allows for more of the pneis to drop and appear longer. I don\'t think that has anything to do with starting size. In terms of Erect gains, which I personally think have nothing to do with lig cutting, I\'d almost be certain that the bigger the starting size the better, as a 10% increase in 5\" penis is going to give greater gains than 10% of an 5\".
You are in fact both right. KFH is mentioning perceived increase, which is proportional to the original Flaccid length, you are referring to measured increase which is fairly static regardless of original Flaccid length. An equivalent stretch of 1\" will literally double the length of a one Inch Flaccid increasing it by 100% , but will seem modest in the case of a five Inch Flaccid which with the same gain will only be lengthened by 20%.
Whether you\'re small before the surgery or long, there is no basis to say that you will gain more after the lig cut..........ive seen before pictures of men where they were 2 inches in Flaccid state & then gained up to 3 inches after the lig cut...........& some that didnt gain more than an Inch................
Everyone is different & until the doctors find a \"100% sure way\" of lengthening the penis, then we shall just work out our tool with stretchers, hangers & anything else we can learn about & do.
Imo, I do think there is a doctor out there in the world that does have the information & techniques to grow the penis in length but for some reason, they are being silenced just like I believe there are cures for aids & cancer.........