@ stillwantmore
Respectfully, I was among a crowd of clientele that expected to receive the median gain, of which was the 3/4
Inch circumference increase that had been numerously reported to the staff at Dr.
Casavantes\' office. This is part of the office\'s daily business, to record the reports received and the analysis of the numbers may show a change among the 10% outcome versus the shown results of the 20% concentration, from my own Unbias/calculated measurements, the conservative 10% concentration, coming upon 3 weeks post op, has given me a gain of only 3/8ths of an
Inch. It should be noted that the mass over volume ratio (density) WILL be different among the concentration of 10% versus 20%, simply stated, there is more solute (material) in the 20% solution (Period). Now if collagen production can produce the off-set of desired
Girth in the next 3 weeks I\'ll let everyone know, I don\'t think anyone can predict if the microfibril matrix will produce significant results or not, it probably varies from patient to patient. We don\'t even know if factors like diet, or supplements encourage collagen, the knowledge out there is like wishing upon a star. I do remember years ago I was in my first anatomy lab and everyone was measuring the same object in (cm) and nearly 80% of the class produced different numbers! When the sample value was 20cm in length, there was a deviation of +/- 2cm. I would give credit that most folks are familar with using a ruler, especially our crowd, but their is that small margin of error. Currently Round 2, can be offered with the originally prescribed 20% concentration. This gives me and other patients something to look forward too. But if i knew differently, than what i know today, I think you guys would know what Coolhand would have advocated for. Respectable, cautious Physicians don\'t typically guarantee something, unless a part of their clinical judgement/personality says other-wise and they feel comfortable doing so.
~CHL