Their response to the idea of using their filler (Megafill) when pre-existing filler may be in play (like
Ellanse or
PMMA) from Proud
Urology's Patient Coordinator:
I can't give you a definitive answer. However, if there is any filler or scar tissue from the previous injection with no space, we normally partially remove them to prevent penis curvature, avoid the shape of the genitals. Then, we can use Megaderm and Megafill to create a safer and more natural shape.
Or, depending on the doctor's decision and patient's preference, surgery without Removal is also possible.
This is in line with what I imagined their response (and most Practitioner responses) to be --> having prior filler (especially if it's different from what is now being offered) tends to create obstacles, but isn't necessarily a complete
"block" or
"no" moving forward. The trouble isn't just the co-existence of fillers, but that any work performed by a previous Injector or Surgeon has to be carefully assessed by any future Physician in order to ensure complications are kept to a minimum (i.e. ensure the procedures are compatible with the appropriate considerations taken).
in other words, it's not the firmness or longevity that matters most in their eyes with respect to this scenario (although satisfaction is obviously important), but the efficacy and practicality of taking on this kind of patient (and most Clinicians would agree I'd imagine). Fortunately, Proud is a team of Urologists with a focus on male sexual health, so having a judgment-by-committee in this regard is even more reassuring (akin to having 2 additional second opinions).
Even so, I'll ask about the longevity & firmness as well.
