The problem I've had with this "Loria proprietary filler" nonsense that's been peddled for years is how
absurd that excuse really is. There is NO REASON your performing physician can't disclose the ingredients, fillers, and materials being put inside of you. Not only is it your right to know as a patient, but this kind of info could come in handy should you (heaven-forbid) deal with a complication down the road.
No offense to Dr. Dellinger or Elysian, but he ought to toss this Loria garbage out and go to something with a considerably better safety profile for the penis (like
Hyaluronic Acid,
Radiesse,
Bellafill, or even
FFT). I have a feeling he may not be privy to the quackery that is Loria-anything.
To all the readers here who may be unfamiliar, the issue with silicone oil is that it can be (a) very prone to migration; (b) when complications arise, they can be much more severe than other fillers; and (c) because results can look so good post-op, it makes it all the more deceptive to those who are not "in the know."
It should be said that the vast majority of practitioners leading in the field of
Male Enhancement either don't use silicone fillers or prefer not using silicone fillers in the penis, and that too should be worth noting. I have only ONE Sponsor who happens to use silicone in other areas of the body (which I can't speak for), and does offer it if asked, but is NOT permitted to advertise it here (a compromise made because he has so much expertise in other male procedures, including lengthening and testicular). Think about this: if all of these phallo-doctors have off-label access to silicone oil, why don't they also use it? The answer is quite simple: no one wants to deal with the issues associated with a poor silicone result.
That said, I don't want to alarm you Magic_Wand, if you were administered Silikon1000 via microdroplet technique, it probably isn't so bad. I can't see why they would do it any other way if all you wanted corrected was the gap.
