antoineclamaran wrote:
Skeptical_One wrote: If uncut penises present an anatomical obstacle that has no other workaround other than Circumcision, that's just reality, not poor medicine. That's like demanding doctors be able to formulate guaranteed Erect length gains, or else they're "bad doctors."
There are at least 2 big problems with circumsicion. I have been given this possibility by the Tijuana team too.
1. Circumcision takes time to heal, so no procedure/insertion can be made until roughly 2 weeks after you had it. So I have to fly to Tijuana (which is the biggest obstacle for someone living across the world), have it, go back and only then pay 2000 dollars more for another flight. An option would be to have it in your own country, but if I am uncircumsized it's because it's not a regular thing and very few doctors know how to do the procedure safely and well. And if not done by the same doctor who is going to work on your shaft, there may be a different view/end goal/ technique and a result that does not sattisfy Dr C or makes it possible for post-work with PMMA.
2. Removing the Foreskin actually cuts away the little Girth I do have. Leaving it without that would make my penis look micropenis Girth level. Cutting away is not what I want, the point is to make it bigger.
I understand your frustrations but until a physician can consistently demonstrate a technique and/or product that eliminates the hurdles presented by
Foreskin, I'm afraid this is currently how it is. Don't get me wrong, uncut guys can and have had modest results in the past, but the risks for aesthetic irregularities are undeniable.
That said, don't give up hope or stop researching. Things can, do, and will develop. If I had stopped when many avenues turned out as a dead end, this site would not exist today.
