Hi @Dr_Oates ! Hope your doing well.

I'd like to have your thoughts on using Teosyal Ultra Deep for a 1st-timer patient, as I am not interested in any other HA for now.

I've been following phalloboards patients reviews and Drs. recommendations + other forums for a while now and found out that sovereignmale, Canada, offers this filler mixed with PRP which in the words of both Dr. Cory Torgerson and the PB patient give great results and doesn't seem to create complications.

In short they say they "use a new technique called PRGM – Platelet Rich Gel Matrix. By combining PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma) and Hyaluronic filler, we create a consistency that is similar to fat. This technique offers a more natural feeling result and will also last longer.".

See the thread here (bit more info on 3rd last post) :
www.phalloboards.info/forum/general-disc...-toronto-canada.html

From what I understand, it would also allow one to be able to mould TUD for longer and more easily, especially using a conservative approach.

Do you think I am correct ? Have you ever tried it ? If so, what do you think about the outcomes ? What do you think about this way to proceed ? And finally would you be willing to try it ?

Thank you for your hard work and the support you bring us, take care.

Hio dpeirot,

I did answer a few minutes ago but it does not show - or maybe everyone will see 2 posts here.

I have not combined PRP and HA. I dont really see the biological reasoning. But his pre/posts look good. Dont know what he is doing for length but it loos very successful.

I have stopped using Ultra deep - it was not as firm as expected and tended to clump. I now use Teosyal RHA4. I have been using this for 2 - 3 years now with just a trial of UD about 18/12 ago.

Hi Dr, thank you very much for your answer.
I also contacted Francis from Androfill and they tend to give the same answer about the utility of PRP combine with HA... So I guess it's just some marketing wizardry from SM.

I think I read that you chose RHA4 for its flexibility, is it correct ? But what do you think about it's firmness compared to other HA fillers like Voluma/Volux or TUD ?

Regards.

dpeirot wrote: Hi Dr, thank you very much for your answer.
I also contacted Francis from Androfill and they tend to give the same answer about the utility of PRP combine with HA... So I guess it's just some marketing wizardry from SM.

I think I read that you chose RHA4 for its flexibility, is it correct ? But what do you think about it's firmness compared to other HA fillers like Voluma/Volux or TUD ?

Regards.

I think RHA4 is firmer than UD. I have not used Volux yet but RHA4 is about the same as Voluma.