PhalloBoards - An Online Community to Discuss Penile Girth Enhancement

Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: UK - London - Considering circumcision post filler - any help

UK - London - Considering circumcision post filler - any help 1 week 1 day ago #1308721123

Hi fellow phallo board users - I have been lurking on here for a while now, even before I had an account.

Last year I went through the process of getting around 30ml of HA in my uncircumcised penis, I am quite above average in starting measurements at 7.5BP x 5.25 mid shaft and I went all the way up to 6.25" mid and 6.5" Girth but I ran into asymmetrical issues and it felt squishy.

Since then I have had around 1/3 dissolved by Androfills' excellent Dr Greta and I have been much happier with the feeling, however there is still visual issues.

I was in a long term relationship for 2.5 years and so I never had a real issue with the visual.

However, now being single, I would rather go for a more natural (as close to undetectable) as posssible look.

Dr Greta stands firmly against Circumcisions and more permanent fillers and prefers more non invasive, reversible gains. She is an excellent Urologist and I value her opinion but just like everyone on here, I am looking for that perfect outcome (if it even exists)

I am considering getting an Circumcision (low and tight) and wanted to ask you guys, if you've had it done, what your experiences have been like?

I am fine with not being able to masterbate as easily, as this is not something I do all the time, if ever & I don't mind losing abit of sensitivity, most of my feeling comes from the glans, just below and my Frenulum anyway.

Ideally I would like to have a completely natural looking enhanced penis, as contradictory as that is.

Is this procedure worth it? for those who have had it done

Does the soft penis look very unnatural without Foreskin and filler? (even when I had 30ml my non-Erect penis looked fantastic, sometimes Hanging at over 7" length and 6" Girth soft) -Turtling etc... is what i'm concerned about - no point having a Circumcision to look natural Erect and very strange soft.

I would love to hear your feedback and listen to some of your stories.

Many thanks

G

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

UK - London - Considering circumcision post filler - any help 5 days 8 hours ago #1308721141

I'm surprised to hear Dr. Greta "stands firmly against Circumcision," -- is this in general, or for the purposes of future Male Enhancement? I'm not disputing her expertise, she's a smart Physician with a solid Urological background, and every Provider does have their preferences.

With Hyaluronic Acid (HA) approached at a very conservative approach (i.e. low volume injections every round), I suppose an uncircumcised (a.k.a. uncut) guy could have an aesthetically satisfactory result. The issue historically is that uncut men have exhibited a higher frequency of aesthetic irregularities (namely the condition called the "accordion effect" where it looks just like it sounds) -- I'm not saying that all uncut guys will inevitably have this problem, only that in my time observing injectable Phalloplasty, the lack of Circumcision has a strong correlation with a higher frequency of aesthetic issues.

This said, Dr. Greta will likely take the approach using HA I suggested initially (HA's temporary nature will ensure you aren't stuck with an undesirable result for a lifetime and/or the necessity for more invasive means of resolution), and frankly, if she feels that Circumcision is not the direction you should take and you intend on keeping her as your Injector (she's the best in Europe so I can't see why you wouldn't), I would take her advice. It may just imply her approach will be markedly reserved -- the aesthetic statistics from other uncircumcised patients may have been exacerbated by both the higher volumes injected AND permanence of fillers like PMMA, although I can't know for certain.

I have to rely on overwhelming patient/member anecdotes & feedback from other Clinics to generally recommend adult Circumcision for fillers unless your Performing Physician is a vetted PhalloBoards practitioner who has recommended against it (there can be valid reasons for their position based on each patient's unique individual needs).

Also as an aside, if you were getting PMMA, I would absolutely advise adult Circumcision. Undesirable outcomes would be very challenging to correct with permanent fillers and could take multiple subsequent appointments to fix (and this is not in conflict with Dr. Greta's advice because she does not use permanent fillers). That said, even PMMA doesn't mean that uncut men are fated to have poor results, but like with all fillers, the rate of aesthetic complication versus those who are Circumcised is notable -- so for guys reading this who are uncut and want PMMA, it TECHNICALLY CAN be done so successfully, but I personally wouldn't recommend it. This makes HA ideal for the uncircumcised man.

I would be curious to know if Dr. Greta explained her position on circumcisions -- I'm assuming you asked her to elaborate? I wonder if this was specifically in your case or more of a general preference on her part? Like I said before, I'm not disagreeing with her if she employs "reversible gains" which you mentioned, via low-volume rounds (which I know Androfill and Dr. Greta are very meticulous with their craftsmanship of the Phallus), but I would like to hear her expert take on this (which I can get myself for the Forum discourse if you don't know, or if it may be a while until you speak to her again).

In a nutshell, if you wish for her to remain your Provider (a Clinic & Doctor that is formally endorsed by me, the de facto Patient Representative & Educator PLUS Administrator of the only site dedicated to this topic for well over a decade) then I would value and adhere to her recommendations if they are strong and/or (obviously if they are) required.

As for your comment on a natural looking penis, we all want as "natural looking" a result as possible, and fortunately, most results that don't go overboard on the Girth can achieve this through incremental rounds over time in the hands of a skillful injector like Dr. Greta. However, for all those reading this post must know that we can be our own harshest critics, and you yourself will know that an enhancement has been done, be it visually, physically, or both. Like any other bodily enhancement (breast, butt, etc.), there will always be a degree of artificiality, even if minimal. It is important I convey this to the Readership & Community because if you are very hypercritical about these kinds of things ("how" natural results end up), injectable Phalloplasty may not be for you. However, if you can go into it knowing that you will personally be able to tell (while most, if not all, others won't) and that you can handle this reality, you can be a qualified candidate for these kinds of procedures.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by Skeptical_One.

UK - London - Considering circumcision post filler - any help 4 days 19 hours ago #1308721146

First and foremost, thank you for taking your time to write such a well thought out and helpful response.

Dr Greta when I mentioned getting a Circumcision or going for Ellanse was against it, I think primarily because

1. Ellanse is not reversible and still has issues such as filler migration, plus harder fillers such as Vollux are comparable in feel with far less risk.

2. She never went into detail about why I shouldn't get a Circumcision but I would presume perhaps it's because my penis is already very aesthetic and above average. My flacid is over 5.5" on average and sometimes close to 7" depending on blood flow. So I can understand from her perspective that it's already well shaped and good, that I'm just going overboard. Whilst she has never implied this, she has made comments saying that my results are good and I should be happy.

I think I'm going to just get some more dissolved so I'm at around 5.75" Girth which would be a 0.50" gain over my base line. Then opt for Vollux top ups, at least for the next few years.

I have very elastic skin and feel like getting a Circumcision would be great for a few years but eventually I feel like after lots of sex it would stretch and start to be moveable and noticeable again.

I think my best bet is as above, get some more dissolved, stick to +0.5" over my baseline and just be happy. 7.5 x 5.75 is a lot of peoples ideal or pretty close and I think that I just need to be happy. I've always had very positive interactions with women. I guess I just wanted that "crazy" look where it looks oversized on my body.

I would still consider PLLA/PMMA in a small amount to get to 5.5/5.75 in the near future, but lets see how it looks after I get it dissolved.

Are there any good clinics who provide PLLA/PMMA in Europe or the UK? I see that Penisfill does PLLA hybrid but for some reason they were doing it at competitive prices to Androfill up until a few months where now it is like £13,000.. Lol!

To any of you who have underwent PLLA/PMMA/Ellanse in uncircumcised members but in subtle amounts, how did this fair long term?

To any of of you who have underwent a low and tight Circumcision, how did this fair long term?



Thank you so much

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

UK - London - Considering circumcision post filler - any help 1 day 17 hours ago #1308721181

How detectable and soft was your first session of volux?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
Moderators: dstern22hoddle10bricebNoxcuseTexasDream