I'm terribly sorry about your ordeal. While your experience with Dr.
Liu isn't characteristic of other reports with his Office (in terms of bedside manner, professionalism, and skill) on both this Forum and through PMs & Emails, I have no reason to doubt that you yourself had an unfortunate and unsatisfactory experience (as thoroughly detailed in your report here).
I feel like after seeing your photos that this could very well be fixed -- I am not absolving Dr.
Liu of any of your present complications, but I will say that Dr. Elist post-op removals are notorious for scarring, and the extent of the fibrosis makes "full
Removal" difficult from my understanding. This comes from reading many past reports from former Elist patients over the span of 15+ years. While I simply can't know given the complicated nature of having gone from the silicone implant to a dermal graft (with the former being notorious for leaving long-term issues), I have to wonder if Dr.
Liu underestimated the impediments that can be present with a former Elist implant
Removal. Now you might say this is something he ought to know but it's not quite that simple because
Phalloplasty is not a standardized methodology and still regarded by some in the medical field as experimental in nature. So I believe this confidence of his you spoke of was natural because he relied on his experience as a Plastic Surgeon, as well as his extensive work involving a whole suite of
Male Enhancement procedures.
However, Dr.
Liu to my knowledge hasn't done a high enough volume of implant removals based on the fact that if someone were to reach out to me for recommendations on
Removal, he wouldn't be on the
shortlist only because there are a handful of others who have the requisite volume of implant removals performed (and not due to a skill issue with respect to Dr.
Liu). The lack of sample size in dealing with former Elist patients (in fairness, this is an educated presumption on my part) may have played a role in him not having the full scope of the degrees of severity that can occur with implant removals (and complications from Elist's implant do range wildly in severity and type throughout the years). And I say this to say that the vast majority of Plastic Surgeons in the U.S. would have even less experience dealing with the scar tissue buildup post Elist implant-
Removal, much less specialize in male
Phalloplasty. Due to the implant's notoriety, some Clinics won't even perform non-surgical penis enlargement procedures on former Elist patients, even if there is no obvious lasting complications.
If I may ask,
have you specifically reached out to him specifically for Revision? I wonder if perhaps (and again, I'm in no way dismissing the legitimacy of your claims) there was a communication breakdown somewhere, because this is not in line with his general reputation & reception of the past few years, and I genuinely believe he's the kind of Surgeon who would want to see a
happy ending for all his Clients -- you have to remember,
Sponsors get additional scrutiny by being on the Forum, which is to the Community's benefit because it holds the Practitioner to a higher standard of care by having a public profile on the only site dedicated to the topic of surgical Male Enhancement.
I strongly recommend trying to reach back out to him and express your grievances like you did here, civil and honest. I genuinely believe he will get back to the drawing board and at the very least correct the Alloderm issue. I implore you to take this route, especially since he's worked on you previously, he'll already be privy to the challenges your penis may present. Since he's already a qualified phalloplastician, going to a third surgeon may only stack new layers of complexity and isn't necessary at present time (first Dr. Elist, then Dr.
Liu, then Dr. John Doe and so on). The only reason I'd recommend going in any other direction is if neither party can come to a reconciliation. That said, he works with a
Urologist when he travels to LA from the Bay Area, perhaps getting him to review your medical records can be that
2nd opinion without having to add the aforementioned layers of complexity -- so ask him about that too.
Please keep us posted, and like I said earlier in this message, I do see a penis that is very correctable. I know it's hard to keep a positive attitude all things considered, but do it for your own future & health, as well as ensuring there can be some degree of reconciliation so that (1) the Doctor does what he promised and (2) the Patient (you) gets what he deserves.