Congratulations on a stellar result given your circumcision status (i.e. uncut), I do mean that.
The 147 cc's is
incredibly high for PMMA, especially over 4 sessions (versus something like 7 rounds). That said, guys with longer shafts can take more product (so if you are a genuine 7"+ long, you can accommodate more without sacrificing aesthetics nearly as much). Furthermore, you were also aiming for a 7" overall girth, so this also explains the high volume of injection. To be frank, I'm actually surprised so much was injected given your uncircumcised status, but perhaps after Dr. Rupeka saw how your dermis "took" the filler, he became more confident that it wouldn't be a
problem penis (in terms of uncut-vs-cut patients) in the long-run.
I want to make crystal clear that being uncircumcised DOES NOT mean you will have a poor or undesirable result. Many guys have had success being uncut in combination with dermal filler. HOWEVER, each foreskin is unique and what HAS BEEN OBSERVED are the odds of aesthetic irregularity in men who are uncircumcised increases dramatically, and also tend to be more difficult to manage/resolve, potentially requiring multiple touch-up rounds. This isn't from one source, this comes from multiple sources, namely the Sponsors of the PhalloBoards who've done the highest volume of procedures, affording them the sample size to confidently assert their claim(s).
Given the trend that most American men are circumcised (I've seen varying stats from 70%-90%, either way a VAST majority), it's easy to see why the
uncircumcised dilemma is a relatively lesser known complication in the U.S. (versus Latin America or Europe). I should also point out that circumcised men are just as susceptible to undesirable outcomes (just like how anyone can end up with a bad haircut or hideous tattoo). however, not to the extent/rate at which uncircumcised men are. These observations have been made by arguably 3 of my most high-volume providers, and none of them even exchanged data with each other in this regard, so no external bias was presented. I know this opinion may be quite controversial (and I say this with no disrespect), but if I were uncircumcised and in the market for girth enhancement by way of injectable fillers, I would strongly consider (if not outright pursue) an adult circumcision (having it
cut per my Phallo-Doc's recommendation). For those adamantly opposed to circumcisions of any kind (and I understand the personal reasons behind it), you'll simply have to assess your own risk threshold, and focus on low volumes early.
I would also strongly advise any future patients who seek out Bellafill providers like Dr. Rupeka, Dr. Nanda, Dr. Shafer, Dr. Carney, and so on,
not to demand they inject beyond what they are comfortable with. My hunch is Dr. Rupeka knew he had a unit (penis) that would be compliant, and he predicted correctly. Other Clinics tend to have volume caps (I think Avanti Derma for a while would max out at 25cc's with rare exceptions,
although I have no idea if this still remains to be the case) to avoid giving too much agency to the patient. You might think this seems counter-intuitive when you are a paying customer seeking out elective cosmetic procedures, but many of these places are more interested in a solid foundation + aesthetic result than to have a guy wind up with with a Frankenstein Dick because he was sure his dick could handle the bulk. I know some Clinics with even less in terms of how much they'll pump the first round.
It isn't a cash flow/repeat business matter, phalloplasty's history has shown that a conservative approach often yields the best results.
That all said, kudos to Dr. Rupeka for identifying that he had a penis he could push the limits of what he typically injects, but please do not go into Youthology (or any other Bellafill provider) assuming you're going to get the 147cc treatment... in fact,
@gsock27
's tailored action plan by Dr. Rupeka was an exception to the rule. Traditionally-speaking, you usually see 20-30cc's of PMMA the first round (depending on length & shape of shaft), with each subsequent round being slightly less in overall volume. This was the complete opposite with
@gsock27
, where his last round had a whopping 60cc's (I almost wonder if this info was provided by way of typo or unintentional error, it's just remarkably high given the prior volumes injected).
Regardless, congrats again! Good to see that some uncircumcised men can overcome the anatomical/dermal obstacles that have plagued some results in the past.