ivan808 wrote:
Skeptical_One wrote: In my estimation, it depends on your relationship status and how broad your dating variety is:
If you have a long-term significant other --> any Girth that exceeds her threshold (of pain and "fit").
If you are single and date mostly under 30's with no kids, I'd say 5.5" is prime, and anything above will have diminishing returns.
If you are single and date the whole field of availability, then I'd say 6.0" is prime, and anything above will have diminishing returns.
This is based on both my experiences and tons of anecdotal information. I should note this applies to a hetero male, and I imagine it's a different standard among gay men from what I've learned in the past.
You can't be serious bro. 5.5'' for under 30s? I'm 5.3'' and I just can't comprehend how adding just 0.2'' would put me in a position where most would feel pain due to my Girth. Not even anal.
I can't be serious? I am serious. Besides, it's an opinion, although a very informed one.
You do realize how exceedingly rare actual girths north of 5.5" are in the general populace? If you're trying to look for "pain" in the sex, I'm afraid to tell you that you're doing it all wrong.
Also note that I didn't say anything beyond 5.5 or 6 "was too much
Girth," but rather, came with diminishing returns. It's important to make this distinction, because not all experiences are the same.
If not for this forum, the idea that anything above 6" was attainable was a dream at best. It's easy for men, with their dicks, to get hung up on self-image, the same way women who have average body types think they're fat (when they're not). Unless you simply don't care for aesthetics and/or your partner's concerns, then sure, no
Girth is too big I suppose?? I just wouldn't recommend getting carried away. Set reasonable goals and stick to them.