TOPIC: PMMA in St. Louis

Cargo is a Centurion poster who registered near the inception of the forum, his vouching is credible in my eyes. Good luck with your progress Jacob!

Thank you sir! I apologize again for coming off in an odd way.

If this is the case and if you want to be impartial, then you should investigate out that cwinters guy;

phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/pmm...ges-9470893?trail=60

And this one too

phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/dr-...57845?pid=1305634010

And of this one where you posted your opinions

phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/dr-...57838?pid=1305617767

The last 2 just have 2 posts each to their name.

Skeptical One wrote: Posting seems a bit too \"advertisey\" to me. Not a conventional or typical first-posting. Not calling you a shill, but most shill posts look like yours. You\'ll need to share more to get off my radar, thanks.

Also, call me a \"skeptic\" but I\'m inclined to call this \"HA & pmma\" mixture a gimmick more than anything. Given the costs of PMMA state-side, you\'re probably looking at negligible volumes of PMMA and will effectively look to top-off with HA periodically. Or maybe this isn\'t a gimmick and the idea is that the PMMA will provide a foundation (albeit minimal) for future HA top-offs, and that\'s the point...who knows? More information will be necessary.

If you are indeed legitimate, think more about sharing pertinent information & experience rather than how amazing the doctor & deals are. Also, if you feel this physician is in-fact the real deal, have him contact me at either This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. if he\'d like to expand his profile online and address a niche forum.

Thanks.

camphallo wrote: If this is the case and if you want to be impartial, then you should investigate out that cwinters guy;

phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/pmm...ges-9470893?trail=60

And this one too

phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/dr-...57845?pid=1305634010

And of this one where you posted your opinions

phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/dr-...57838?pid=1305617767

The last 2 just have 2 posts each to their name.

The original post by Jacob has been deleted and replaced. It was nothing like what is there now and read like a total advert. Completely not comparable to the links you\'ve provided. If you\'d been able to read Jacobs original post you\'d understand why SO and everyone who read it thought it sounded like an advert.

So far I'm happy. It feels nice having a thicker Girth. My hopes is that someone eventually comes up with a better way to give men the enhancement they're looking for. Men in 100 years will be set. There's no telling what kind of advances are on the horizon. I'm not knocking PMMA by no mean. I'm grateful to have had the opportunity to go through with it. Could you imagine walking into an office picking out what you want and they grow it in a lab to the specific measurement given?

Jacob wrote: So far I'm happy. It feels nice having a thicker Girth. My hopes is that someone eventually comes up with a better way to give men the enhancement they're looking for. Men in 100 years will be set. There's no telling what kind of advances are on the horizon. I'm not knocking PMMA by no mean. I'm grateful to have had the opportunity to go through with it. Could you imagine walking into an office picking out what you want and they grow it in a lab to the specific measurement given?

That\'s depressive as fuck. You realise that you probably will never have what you want in your lifetime span, while someone in the future will have options for getting whatever size they want. I\'m so depressed just because I was born in the wrong time. Sorry for whining, I\'m just very tired of this and feels empty.

Herbert West wrote: I\'m so depressed just because I was born in the wrong time. Sorry for whining, I\'m just very tired of this and feels empty.

Sorry to hear that. What are your Erect measurements?

@herbert west: I do feel your pain brother. I risked my Dick out of desperation to beat something that was causing so much negativety in my life. I do know that I will probably never have exactly what I want. however I pride myself in helping by feeding data of my experience to push this process along for other men. If I have a son, god forbid he feels like we do, I want there to be something to improve his situation. We are making a difference.

@think: 6.5 el and 5 Inch Girth Erect at the fattest point. I have a huge fat pad and I'm trying to change my lifestyle to get rid of that. I will be happy with my length after the weight loss and I only want one more round of filler. There isn't much beyond my circ scar. I'm a Grower and have terrible retraction.

think wrote: Sorry to hear that. What are your Erect measurements?

I\'m at the average statistical range, but before of the comments like \"Dude, why then you so depressed of your length?\" I want to say next: almost everyone on this board are obsessed with huge, literally insane Girth. And no one want to deal with average Girth. In real life Girth of 6\" and more is very rare and considered as \"huge\". But here we can see that some people already have 6\" Girth before of any procedure and they\'re still want more Girth. Someone have a goal of 8\" EG. There\'s a few people with a real 8\" EG (one of them is @Sizemic), and the other guy (@FatMike if I\'m not mistaken) have a 10\" EG! This is insane.But as for length, I\'ve seen comments like \"Man, you have 5 (6)\" BPEL, it\'s ok, you\'re in statistical range of average size, don\'t give up\". So how this is even possible? People who wants (or who already have) huge Girth, at the same time saying that the \"average length is good\". I don\'t understand those people, sorry. In my vision, you CANNOT say \"I have a big Dick\" if you have, let\'s say, 6.5 EG but only 5-6.5\" EL (statistical range of the average Erect length). Girth is more important thing, but without decent length, it\'s useless. Just my opinion.

Herbert West wrote:
I\'m at the average statistical range, but before of the comments like \"Dude, why then you so depressed of your length?\" I want to say next: almost everyone on this board are obsessed with huge, literally insane Girth. And no one want to deal with average Girth. In real life Girth of 6\" and more is very rare and considered as \"huge\". But here we can see that some people already have 6\" Girth before of any procedure and they\'re still want more Girth. Someone have a goal of 8\" EG. There\'s a few people with a real 8\" EG (one of them is @Sizemic), and the other guy (@FatMike if I\'m not mistaken) have a 10\" EG! This is insane.But as for length, I\'ve seen comments like \"Man, you have 5 (6)\" BPEL, it\'s ok, you\'re in statistical range of average size, don\'t give up\". So how this is even possible? People who wants (or who already have) huge Girth, at the same time saying that the \"average length is good\". I don\'t understand those people, sorry. In my vision, you CANNOT say \"I have a big Dick\" if you have, let\'s say, 6.5 EG but only 5-6.5\" EL (statistical range of the average Erect length). Girth is more important thing, but without decent length, it\'s useless. Just my opinion.

Totally and respectfully disagree...
It is NOT just about stats, it is about real life experiences...

Herbert West wrote: almost everyone on this board are obsessed with huge, literally insane Girth.

Some are, but not almost everyone. There are quite a few guys just at or below average who just want to move to above average--which is doable.

Herbert West wrote: In my vision, you CANNOT say \"I have a big Dick\" if you have, let\'s say, 6.5 EG but only 5-6.5\" EL (statistical range of the average Erect length). Girth is more important thing, but without decent length, it\'s useless. Just my opinion.

Same as what @Mustang said ... but even with stats, if a guy is 6.5 EL by 6 EG he\'s in the 99th percentile for Girth, 90th for length, and 99th for volume... that certainly is a big Dick!

Herbert West wrote: In my vision, you CANNOT say \"I have a big Dick\" if you have, let\'s say, 6.5 EG but only 5-6.5\" EL (statistical range of the average Erect length). Girth is more important thing, but without decent length, it\'s useless. Just my opinion.

An opinion? Length plays only a visual role in \"bigness\" and that circumference has a much greater impact in overall size. This can be demonstrated objectively.

A 5\" EL x 6.5\" EG is a penis you argue isn\'t big but is roughly the same volume as a penis I\'m assuming you and many others would consider big: an 8\" EL x 5\" EG.

Volume takes all dimensions into account, thus being the most practical reference for determining \"big\" and \"very big.\"

Furthermore, Mustang raises a good point, although anecdotal, which lends additional credence to dispelling your assertion: Most men on this forum report that gains in Girth yield more physical responses from women than length gain successes. So significant is this reality that the term \"Girth is king\" is ever so prevalent on this site.

I\'ll give you this much... length can prove to be beneficial as a visual trait, which is why some are \"hung.\" Length can also be useful in expanding sex positions. Ideally if I could, I\'d have a 6.5\" EL so that I wouldn\'t rob myself of Balls-deep experiences with some tighter gals. Long enough to explore most/all positions with most women while not being a harpoon prodding at the cervix.

The problem is: (Edited) \"MANY\" men do not understand how women \"see\" our tool, Men only see porn and use it as a failing measuring stick...stick, you get it? LOL.

(Edited) \"MANY\" Women have no clue about volume, size, Girth or length. Their man\'s Dick is great if they have good feelings for him, but when they have their emotional fits, their man now has a very small Dick OR their man has a painfully big Dick....You can never make them understand....

I have said it a hundred times, Dick is only a fraction of how women see men....Please get it!

EDITED: didn\'t mean to say ALL, I should have said \"Many\" So I added it today.

Mustang2020 wrote: The problem is: men do not understand how women \"see\" at our tool, Men only see porn and use it as a failing measuring stick...stick, you get it? LOL.

Women have no clue about volume, size, Girth or length. Their man\'s Dick is great if they have good feelings for him, but when they have their emotional fits, their man now has a very small Dick OR their man has a painfully big Dick....You can never make them understand....

I have said it a hundred times, Dick is only a fraction of how women see men....Please get it!

That is a gross generalization of women. There are all kinds of women out there. I personally have not noticed any difference between men and women, all differences are based on individuality. I know plenty of women who have no interest in relationships or monogamy, I have dated several who masturbate to porn 3-4 times a day, including in lunch brake, plenty who dont care what the guy earns, or if he is smart. I dated a gal, who fuck her first cousin, who was mentally challenged, because he looked good and had a huge Dick. True story, her family still dont talk to her.
And in terms of penis, I think it is as huge of a deal to most women as it is to us. Too big , or even worse - too small is a an immediate deal breaker.
And again it is individual. I have 6.7 length on a good day and I have been with a girl who can barely take 2/3 in. Then I have been with a woman who took a giant dildo right to the bottom - 11 inches!! And she knew this well and said I am ok with size, but she needs way above average to be happy.
So it all depends who are you dating. And this is a wonderful thing. Nothing is better than variety and if the girl is not happy with your Dick the next girl is just around the corner.