TOPIC: PMMA not covering penis base and scrotal tissue - looking for advice!!

Hi,

I\'ve posted before shortly after my procedure with Dr C. I had 30% PMMA injected. The results are mixed because of the following issue and I would really appreciate advice and personal experiences in this area:

Relevant background: Before my PMMA procedure I had a dermal graft inserted and then removed (long story). When it was removed, my circ scar was cut open and then sutured back, causing me to lose a lot of the circ scar skin, and making the skin too short for the penis and the base to be covered by body skin snd scrotlal tissue the bottom. I also had a penile scrotlal web removed because of this issue.

I didn\'t realize this was such an issue before my PMMA procedure. It became very noticeable when Dr C only covered the tissue from the original penis , leaving the base uncovered except at the very top in the suspensory ligaments area. You can see in the attached photos that this makes my penis look shorter especially from the left side (which can be improved) and a bit weird. I think Dr C was trying to avoid the scrotlal skin but the result is that my penis looks shorter with a very \'thin\' base.

I wanted to get another opinion so I contacted Dr Passy in Brazil (is anyone familiar with him?? Please let me np know if you are..). He didn\'t seem to think scrotal skin was a big issue and that he thought the base should be covered much more fully and not only covering the suspensory ligaments as is the case now. That would mean that some of the PMMA would probably cover scrotal tissue near the bottom of my penis but on the sides there still is more \'white\' skin (see pics).

I would very much like to hear from anyone who has had or heard of a similar issue or anything similar. I am attaching several pics illustrating all of this.

In pic 1 you can see how the PMMA does not cover the base of the penis, only the \"old\" base which is where a small scar can be seen.

Pic 2 - you can see what it looks like from the \'good side\'

Pic 3 - view from that top

Pic 4 - zoom out view.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!!!

:

Hi.

All your pics are Erect, right? I think if there were PMMA on the sides of your base it would look good in the Erect state but it would look unnatural when Flaccid and retracted, the scrotal skin with the PMMA would be bigger than the shaft as the skin is not so tight there. So turteling will 'push'the PMMA outwards. I guess it looks fine while Flaccid right?

Thank you for responding. Yes these are all in the Erect state and yes it looks fine Flaccid (see attached photo). I think the point you are making. But if you look at the photos from the Erect state you can see that there is some white skin on the sides, which I think, is regular body skin \'stretched out\' by the internal penis being longer than its shaft skin, and only scrotal skin at the bottom. Also, after the first procedure, I used the stretching device that Wade recommended that \'pulls\' from the glans, almost all of the time for a month, and when I use it, it stretches out my \'internal\' penis making it look similar to the Erect state, thus missing PMMA on the sides of the base . I wonder if this could counter what you call \'turteling\'\' and end up \'exposing\' more of the part of the penis that is buried inside when it is Flaccid now, or not. I was hoping to get another PMMA layer for further widening, but if there if there is no way to counter what you are saying, then it could make the PMMA even more noticeable... Thanks again!

I think you look really good - I had surgery years ago and fussed for years over the angles I thought my Dick looked odd and where more was needed obsessively. Not saying you are doing that at all - but but for where you are now you look great. D.