TOPIC: Jelq Nicholson's considerations

Hi everyone,

I\'ve been a lurker there for about two months and want to thank you for this awesome forum.

Please excuse my english as it\'s not my mother tong (I\'m french ).

So, I\'m thinking about PMMA, and if I do it, I\'ll post my progress here as a contribution.

From what I\'ve read so far, I\'m considering 30% concentration, not only because it yells more gain in a round but also for the firmness. I have a firm wand and I want to keep it firm lol. Reading HunkChunck on the subject reinforces my thoughts.

I\'ve read it\'s not the best for the aesthetics, especially when Flaccid, but the feeling is more important than the look (to me). I would bet on good massages to avoid lumps or irregularities, and there is always the possibility to fix it in another round. Considering the touch when Flaccid, I\'ve read some complaints but also guys happy with 30% concentration.

Well, as I live in Europe, I would go for Dr N, who does 30%. I\'ve read good things about her on this board. Do you guys know a bad story that happened with this Dr ?

My goal would be about 0.75 increase, starting at 5.75 nbpel x 4.8 to 5 eg.

If you guys have comments on what I\'ve just written I take everything and I will keep reading to put up my decision.

Thanks again !

Oh, and about my name, I did natural PE for 2 years with minor success (about 0.2 Girth gains mostly from Clamping)

Are you Circumcised?

@hoddle10

Yes I am, but my skin isn\'t tight, and I restored skin from Jelqing (not volontarily).

And forgot to say, my gland is quite small... what you think about 0.75 increase in that case ?

I\'ll post pictures when I have the time to.

When you say your glans is quite small, what do you mean? Are you saying it is around the size of your current Erect Girth or smaller?

My belief is that glans size should play a big role in the shape of your enlargement. You should be able to balance out the glans by tapering the PMMA to have more enlargement towards the base and less at the glans.

Jelq Nicholson wrote: @hoddle10

Yes I am, but my skin isn\'t tight, and I restored skin from Jelqing (not volontarily).

And forgot to say, my gland is quite small... what you think about 0.75 increase in that case ?

In guess you need to ask for a taper then, as you don\'t want the shaft to dwarf the glans.

The only reason I asked is you were Circumcised is because a few guys who aren\'t have had some issue\'s with 30%.

You mean a cone shape right ?

I\'ve read some people there (don\'t remember who) who went for a cone shape but soon after went back for a can shape.

My Dick is already quite tapered, going from 5 at the base to 4.5 right under the glan.

So adding an overall 0.75 would put me at about 5.75 base, 5.25 right under the glan. I think it would be the best bet. But I can be wrong.

My glan doesn\'t look small when Erect, it looks well proportionate. Except sometimes it isn\'t engorged when Erect, it doesn\'t happen that much, and I know how to fix it...

When Flaccid, it\'s small I used to be a true Grower, manual pe made me more of a shower, that\'s where my glan look the smallest...

Here are some pictures:

I would not say that your glans is small. It extends past the Girth of your shaft. I think you would be fine going either route, tapered or straight.

yes you must be right, thanks.

I have some other questions:

Do you think I risk the \"pig in a blanket\" style ?

And would I loose my slight upward curve ? (that I like)

If the Girth of your shaft gets disproportionate to your glans, then yes.
I would think this would be where the tapered approach would be beneficial, if you are wanting a good deal more Girth than the size of our glans.
Some guys do not care if their shaft Girth overshadows their glans, others desire something different. It\'s a personal preference as to what you desire for your appearance.
As for the question of keeping or losing the curve, I do not know. I am sure there are others on here that can answer that one.

Okay, that\'s hard to guess...

Hopefully, as I streched my skin with manual PE I don\'t turtle too much.
I will study the question.

I found something interesting, in the PMMA ninja turtle thread from HunkChunk.

The beginning of the thread made me fear having 30% done, in fact I\'ve already read it, but didn\'t notice all the details.

Then, I read what is quoted below, from HunkChunk, about the \"pig in a blanket\" problem:

\"Yes, I think this is so because one doesn\'t want an inner more flexible layer of collagen surrounded by an outer more rigid layer. Otherwise your collagen tends to move up and down the shaft, the inner slide due to the flexible inner layer, the exterior motion being gravity induced by the weight of the rigid outer layer. One ends up feeling like your unit is wrapped with a segment of hose and it looks and feels like an artificial implant surrounding the original thinner organ. It no longer appears to be a simple enhancement.\"\"One can assume that proceeding the other way around would keep the mass of weight closer to the original shaft contours, with any rigidity of the texture being concealed by an outer layer of softer tissues which feel much more natural. Your unit would feel relatively naturally soft to the touch but would offer increasing resistance as you press down. It would not slide around loosely on the shaft, and would not appear or feel like an artificial implant.\"

Original post here: phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/sho...7641037&postcount=30

So what about 10% on top of 30% ?

I made my previous post more simple...

Any advice ?

A little update.

Last week I was very into having PMMA this summer. I want the safest way so I was planning to go with Dr C and crew, even if it\'s 3x more expensive for me than with Dr N.

So, because it\'s a permanent procedure and I don\'t want to fool myself, I started reading and re reading the complications threads, PMMA Removal, progress reports etc.

On saturday I emailed Wade, to have his point of vue about complications, here are the questions & answers (nothing new here but can be helpful for some...):

Q - Concerning the risks, I\'ve read granulomas can form even years after the interventions, my question is how often this kind of complication occurs and have you had cases when it needs to be surgically removed ?-I\'ve also read they are better treated if detected early, would a regular appointment with an Urologist be a good way to detect them as soon as possible ?

A - Granulomas are due to improper technique, poor quality product, and experience. We have not had any patient have a medical need for Removal. Irregularities, and bumps can occur, and are treated at a second treatment, either by breaking them up with the micro cannula, and then camouflage the area, or a cortisone (Kenalog) injection. - One cortisone injection usually takes care of a bump that may occur. Patients can get them treated by our office at a second session, or at a doctor of their choice. Round one is typically the time that you will notice these irregularities, since the tissue in this specific area is very unstable. By round two, your skin has become very stable, and is much more capable of keeping the product in place.

Q - Are there others complications that I should be aware of ?

A - Irregularities are the main issue that we have to be very conscious of.

Q -What is the actual price for the first and subsequent interventions ?

A - The pricing structure using Metacril PMMA is as follows: $2500 for the first treatment, $2000 for the second treatment, and $1500 for all additional sessions. Touch up sessions will be $1000 up to five cc's of PMMA. LinneaSafe (Formerly NewPlastic) PMMA is available for an additional $250 per procedure.

I remain concerned about the possible severe complications, even if I believe in the expertise of Dr C\'s team. From my understanding, the consensus here is that they can also be due to patient foreign body reaction (rare), even if the technique and product avoid it the best.

I also understood better what Radiesse is (reading it here), and as it\'s similar, I agree it would be a good try prior to PMMA. The problem is the same as other guys in Europe, very expensive to travel to the US for a temporary solution. I searched in France but nothing about Radiesse in the penis so far, I\'ll keep searching and emailing some Drs maybe, while I\'m not very optimistic about it.

So, still into considerations phase, I\'ll keep you posted.

I had this question asked to me by another member in a PM. Arent you concerned about the complications? I replied, \"It is relatively safe from research Iv done and what the Dr has stated. Of course there\'s always risks, but if I were to occupy all my thoughts on the risks and what if\'s in life then I wouldn\'t even get in my car and drive to work because of the risk there is of driving.\"