TOPIC: 1 year and almost 2 months later! PMMA.

I haven\'t decided yet if I want an increase. If I did, it would only be at the base and then fill in the small gap between the base and mid shaft.
Otherwise I am happy with the results.
My goal would be to be just a little over my mid shaft size at the base and then taper it down to where I am at already.
I hope that answered your question.

I have the same general tapering toward base from upper-mid shaft as you. Interesting how it wants to retain it\'s overall shape. I wonder if I tried to fill the lower shaft if the product would re-apportion itself to maintain the pollywogish shape. Right now, I\'m .25\" skinnier in lower-midshaft (near base) than higher midshaft.

Hey Ghost What\'s up How are you doing

@Zayne: I am also wondering the same thing. That had me worried a bit too. I like what I have right now for Girth but I just want to fix the base. Now if it re-positions it-self to the mid-shift, than it will be largely disproportional. Which has me a little worried to go for a full round 2 PMMA or even just touch-ups.
@GultzMaster: Hey GM. I am going good. On day 2 of using that ADS device. It is quite unusual to use. I can feel it pulling at the ligament at the base of my member. I do not know if this slight pain (do not know if I should say it is a pain or a awkward pulling sensation) is normal. I managed 8 hours total the first day and only 4.5 hours today. I split it into two shifts per day and stretch for 2 days than take the third day as a rest day. This way I avoid injury.
How have you been?

ghostfmj wrote: Now, my relationship wasn\'t perfect, we fought a lot. I believe that the thing that caused my fiancee to leave is that it now hurt her to have sex with me. Which led to less and less sex, which led to her leaving.

Welcome back. I followed your thread at the old board, you are one of our pioneers
I\'m sorry to hear about your relationship. I may be in a similar situation.

Did the situation with the size causing pain improve at all over time? I noticed that after the procedure your MSEG stats grew to about the same Girth as your base. Why was this a problem, did you not insert to the base previously?

@Zayne: I am also wondering the same thing. That had me worried a bit too. I like what I have right now for Girth but I just want to fix the base. Now if it re-positions it-self to the mid-shift, than it will be largely disproportional. Which has me a little worried to go for a full round 2 PMMA or even just touch-ups.


In R1, by 6 weeks, upper-shaft stayed 5.75\"; lower-shaft, 5.3\" -- my pre-R1 was 5\". In R2, upper and lower maintained a .25\" difference, with upper 6.25\" and lower 6\", consistently until about day 40. Now, day 46, and divergence seems to continue rapidly as it did post-R1 -- upper can still reach 6.25\" while lower is 5.8-9\". Meanwhile, base Girth is skewed to 6.5\" because of a ring-like \'bump\' visible from the underside. I am going to talk to Wade about how to address this, as I don\'t want to accidentally contribute further to the disproportion.

@Zayne: I am also wondering the same thing. That had me worried a bit too. I like what I have right now for Girth but I just want to fix the base. Now if it re-positions it-self to the mid-shift, than it will be largely disproportional. Which has me a little worried to go for a full round 2 PMMA or even just touch-ups.


In R1, by 6 weeks, upper-shaft stayed 5.75\"; lower-shaft, 5.3\" -- my pre-R1 was 5\". In R2, upper and lower maintained a .25\" difference, with upper 6.25\" and lower 6\", consistently until about day 40. Now, day 46, and divergence seems to continue rapidly as it did post-R1 -- upper can still reach 6.25\" while lower is 5.8-9\". Meanwhile, base Girth is skewed to 6.5\" because of a ring-like \'bump\' visible from the underside. I am going to talk to Wade about how to address this, as I don\'t want to accidentally contribute further to the disproportion either. It\'s a risky venture, I agree!