TOPIC: Excel tool PMMA progress

Here is what I need. First I will take suggestions.
In this format:
Patient:
Age:
Race:
Smoke:
Regular alcohol consumption:
Body type:
Circumisized: yes or no
Starting size: BPEL inches
MSEG \"\"
Round 1
Solution concentration: example 10%
CC received:
Net gain at 6 weeks:

Follow above for all other rounds
Finally
Irregularities: yes/no

I will take all of this data and build a spreadsheet. The data will only be as reliable as the collector. It might reveal some corelations.
This is my idea and please feel free to throw out any ideas.

I like this idea. Thread pinned.

I would like to see the flaccid starting stats aswell on there. fl fg
And of course grower or shower. Therefore i would also like to see the forum define these terms in a more specific way where numbers are included.
I always thought of a grower this way. You have to be under or exactly 10cm/3,93\" length and/or girth.

Because with this grower shower case its always like some people rather like to call themselfs showers, even if they arent. (egothingi once more)


Aswell you can basicly say if you can somewhat relate to this picture in a way, thenyou are a grower.

1.bp.blogspot.com/-y1OMhRc6eiU/Tfo-tGJ0R...1600/StatueDavid.jpg


Why are we taking BPEL and not NBPEL, just curious.
Take both then. With both everyone will be serverd.

BPEL is much more consistent and offers a reliable method to assess length and/or gains. What is NOT consistent is gains measured at six weeks post-op. Results will change drastically and only settle for certain at around 6 months. I went from 6.125\"MSEG at 6 weeks to a current 5.25\"MSEG. If one thinks they will maintain their results at the six week mark, they are really going to be disappointed by month five. Ask a veteran.

I think the reason I chose 6 weeks is because it is the point at which you can get the second procedure. I understand that gains will not stay, but not everyone is going to wait six months until round 2 so this will be latest possible target. This will be our known point.

I am not opposed to Flaccid results. I guess I am not so concerned about Flaccid cause that\'s it\'s only good for peeing. No really I am not opposed its just Flaccid is relative too many variables.

Spoken like a math pro, maybe we can find the vertex and plot it out?I agree there is a huge difference between going for a cold swim and taking a hot shower.

Most definitely, count on scatter plots.

Its absolutley possible do messure the Flaccid penis. We are not talking about hot shower or cold bath but about normal messurement done a couple of time when you by no means aroused or having a oxygenpush because you are laying down on the couch and just felt the need to streched your body. I know the excat min-Flaccid and max-Flaccid size of mine fl/fg. easy.

Please take the shower/Grower aspect in because i want to check if the penistype can be related to the outcome of the aesthetics and the settleing of PMMA in general in whatever state.

I think it is an excellent idea. The more accurate we get the better.

What is NOT consistent is gains measured at six weeks post-op. Results will change drastically and only settle for certain at around 6 months. I went from 6.125\"MSEG at 6 weeks to a current 5.25\"MSEG. If one thinks they will maintain their results at the six week mark, they are really going to be disappointed by month five. Ask a veteran.

@Miracle So, if your current at the time was 5.25\" , what was the net gain? Is this typical?
Thanks

Did the PMMA interfere with your implant for ED ?