Okay this question is for the long guys and may help me (and others) put
Erect length into perspective.
If you ever notice on pornography (a horrible point-of-reference, but bear with me) how really long guys (7\" +) don\'t go all the way in and so anywhere from 1\"-2\" are usually exposed during the thrust of intercourse? Is this done for camera trick to create the appearance of a bigger
Dick, or is it because odds are he\'s bottoming her out?
Or for guys on this forum, especially the 6.5\" NBPEL+, do you find that you experience dry
Dick because of a woman\'s anatomy some of the time, all of the time, or none of the time?
Again, what I mean by dry
Dick is the 1\" to 2\" of lower shaft & base that aren\'t inserted into the vagina when having intercourse. If you pull up any super-long
Dick porn, virtually most of them experience dry
Dick and don\'t fuck
Balls deep.
The reason I ask is to assess the importance of
Erect length in general. At 5\"
BPEL (with the hopes of obtaining 6\" one day), I could conceivably go
Balls deep in every chick, though whether I\'d bottom out would depend on the individual chick (and probably wouldn\'t happen often at 5\"). With the ability to do this, I provide genital-to-genital stimulation, especially with her clitoris, and if my
Girth is of 5.5\" or thicker, I can\'t see why a penis like 6x6 wouldn\'t be more ideal than say a 8 x 5.5 ?? Obviously ideal is subjective, but do you all sense where I\'m going with this? Long guys can\'t go
Balls deep (or so I think) in most women, thus clitoral stimulation from genital-on-genital action isn\'t present. A penis 5\" to 6\" could provide
Balls-deep clitoral stimulation , and if the
Girth were adequate, could ultimately improve the odds of intercourse-induced orgasm??
Please discuss, and point out any errors in my thinking here.