TOPIC: New Dr in Italy for metacrill

mediatps wrote:
When you say feel the material do you mean, its really obvious? If my girlfriend was to have her hand on my soft penis and was squeezing and playing with it, would she notice that there is obviously something inside? Does it feel like it could be part of the penis shaft or not?

Let me elaborate if I have a wank or somebody gives me one they can't feel , only if she basically pinch your penis she can feel the material

mediatps wrote:
When you say feel the material do you mean, its really obvious? If my girlfriend was to have her hand on my soft penis and was squeezing and playing with it, would she notice that there is obviously something inside? Does it feel like it could be part of the penis shaft or not?

Are you Circumcised? If you aren\'t, then getting 30% is a hell of risk in my opinion. We\'ve seen some great results, but we\'ve also seen that it\'s quite common for uncut guys to end up with a result that looks pretty unnatural.

biggy wrote:
Are you Circumcised? If you aren\'t, then getting 30% is a hell of risk in my opinion. We\'ve seen some great results, but we\'ve also seen that it\'s quite common for uncut guys to end up with a result that looks pretty unnatural.

I am not Circumcised and my results are good . I believe it's all about the Dr skills

Superman wrote:
I am not Circumcised and my results are good . I believe it's all about the Dr skills

There have been a number of good results with uncircumcised guys. But even Dr C says it\'s harder to get a good result on uncut guts. The reason is because the skin is so mobile. The Dr\'s is of course important, but there are certain conditions that are better or worse for any procedure. The combination of uncut and 30% is the highest risk in terms of aesthetics. When it goes well, it looks fantastic, like yours, because the abundance of skin means it easily accommodates the PMMA and hides imperfections. But on many guys the mobile skin cause the PMMA to bunch in the middle and not settle behind the glans or at the base. The trouble is every one has a different penile anatomy. Some people have naturally tighter skin than others and with fillers that makes all the difference.

biggy wrote:
There have been a number of good results with uncircumcised guys. But even Dr C says it\'s harder to get a good result on uncut guts. The reason is because the skin is so mobile. The Dr\'s is of course important, but there are certain conditions that are better or worse for any procedure. The combination of uncut and 30% is the highest risk in terms of aesthetics. When it goes well, it looks fantastic, like yours, because the abundance of skin means it easily accommodates the PMMA and hides imperfections. But on many guys the mobile skin cause the PMMA to bunch in the middle and not settle behind the glans or at the base. The trouble is every one has a different penile anatomy. Some people have naturally tighter skin than others and with fillers that makes all the difference.

Hi,why the dr.in italy have noch Pics and Infos for His Penis Filler technique?and i want Go to hin in the next Werks ist this possibly,is the PMMA from the Dr.permanent?is the price expensive?i write him but Not become a andere,how can See Pics from His works can everyone sent me Infos?thanks from Hamburg germany

Murat wrote:

Hi,why the dr.in italy have noch Pics and Infos for His Penis Filler technique?and i want Go to hin in the next Werks ist this possibly,is the PMMA from the Dr.permanent?is the price expensive?i write him but Not become a andere,how can See Pics from His works can everyone sent me Infos?thanks from Hamburg germany

Is the result in Erection longer ,how many cm can the doctor make in Erection ?

That\'s what I\'m going to get in the future: 30% PMMA, uncircumcised, big volume of product (probably 50 to 70 cc\'s) for gaining 4 cm.Am I asking for trouble in this case?

Herbert West wrote: That\'s what I\'m going to get in the future: 30% PMMA, uncircumcised, big volume of product (probably 50 to 70 cc\'s) for gaining 4 cm.Am I asking for trouble in this case?

Sounds like it might be risky? If I were around average Girth (like you said you were) I personally would not want to go over about an Inch gain. But that\'s me. Going with a couple rounds of smaller volumes, assessing the situation given time, and quitting while ahead of the game would make a lot of sense to me. For example, Restoration said he was good after round two, then look what happened... But like I\'ve said, guys have individual goals for various reasons.

Herbert West wrote: That\'s what I\'m going to get in the future: 30% PMMA, uncircumcised, big volume of product (probably 50 to 70 cc\'s) for gaining 4 cm.Am I asking for trouble in this case?

You mean 4 in Erection length?or 4 cm longer in normal?for ne is importend that i become 3-4cm longer Penis in Erection...is this possibly,can anywhere ASK the doctor?and how ist the risk with necrose?

biggy wrote:
Are you Circumcised? If you aren\'t, then getting 30% is a hell of risk in my opinion. We\'ve seen some great results, but we\'ve also seen that it\'s quite common for uncut guys to end up with a result that looks pretty unnatural.

Hi Biggy, yes I am uncircumcised. I assume the same issue would be present if I went the Ellanse route as well unless there is something about the carrier that makes it less prone to clumping while it absorbs.

I am wondering if the route of having small amounts of 30%, say 8ml at a time waiting 2 weeks to see how it sets and then maybe having a little more would reduce the chance of really bad aesthetics?

I am intrigued as to why people on this forum think this new Dr\'s approach of offering 8ml and then coming back 2 weeks later for a little top up is a bad idea. I know it takes a while for the collagen to form but presumably after two weeks you get a sense of the shape and the areas that need more. Is that not the case?

think wrote: Sounds like it might be risky? If I were around average Girth (like you said you were) I personally would not want to go over about an Inch gain. But that\'s me. Going with a couple rounds of smaller volumes, assessing the situation given time, and quitting while ahead of the game would make a lot of sense to me. For example, Restoration said he was good after round two, then look what happened... But like I\'ve said, guys have individual goals for various reasons.

I\'m in the average range of Erect length, but as for Girth I\'m only 11 cm (4.25\"). My goal is to have a strong 15 cm (6\") of EG.

Murat wrote: You mean 4 in Erection length?or 4 cm longer in normal?for ne is importend that i become 3-4cm longer Penis in Erection...is this possibly,can anywhere ASK the doctor?and how ist the risk with necrose?

Currently there are no methods or surgeries to make penis 4 cm longer.

@Herbert West

50-70cc\'s of 30% PMMA I would never recommend, and would require a long, ideally-shaped & skin-compliant shaft to even contend with the potential aesthetic irregularities that (almost) inevitably come with this route.

Realistically, with each passing session you\'ll see less CC\'s injected and possibly a reduction of PMMA concentration (as most people do with Dr. C & Dr. M). If you were to do 3 Rounds of 20cc each or 4 Rounds of 15cc each...to be honest I think it\'s both excessive & far more product than necessary to achieve 4cm Girth gain.

If you were expecting 50-70cc\'s in one session, you\'ve gone mad.

Skeptical One wrote: @Herbert West

50-70cc\'s of 30% PMMA I would never recommend, and would require a long, ideally-shaped & skin-compliant shaft to even contend with the potential aesthetic irregularities that (almost) inevitably come with this route.

Realistically, with each passing session you\'ll see less CC\'s injected and possibly a reduction of PMMA concentration (as most people do with Dr. C & Dr. M). If you were to do 3 Rounds of 20cc each or 4 Rounds of 15cc each...to be honest I think it\'s both excessive & far more product than necessary to achieve 4cm girth gain.

If you were expecting 50-70cc\'s in one session, you\'ve gone mad.

Thanks for response. No, I mean I want to get 50-70 cc\'s in total, not in one procedure. I think it will be 3 or 4 full sessions. My main concern is:- I\'m uncircumcised and honestly don\'t want to be circumcised, but I want significant girth enhancement- I don\'t want to have a \"cone shape\" of the penile shaft (from base to glans). Anything but not a cone shape. Ideally I want to have a straight \"tube shape\" of the shaft (or in other words \"cylindrical shape\") like in these cases:1. phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/sho...count=1&forum=196666 (perfect work by Dr.C)2. phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/sho...unt=246&forum=196666

Also, what\'s your thoughts on how much cc\'s (in average) is necessary to gain 4 cm (from 11 cm to 15 cm)?

Herbert West wrote: Also, what\'s your thoughts on how much cc\'s (in average) is necessary to gain 4 cm (from 11 cm to 15 cm)?

I was actually thinking about this for different reasons. But it seems like every 6 ml might equal about 1/4\" if your EL is 6.

Another thing to consider is the additional thickness that you will have over your tunica. You can approximate this with a circle formula (I know the penile circumference may be more oval). For example, if you went from a 5\" EG to 5.5 EG, the change in radius (amount of filler over the tunica) is just a little more than 1/16\". If you went from 4.25 EG to 6 EG, that goes up to 0.28\" which is more substantial. For voluma this would be an issue, but it may be different for PMMA and Ellanse. Both subtle and glam82 have over a half Inch EG gain with Ellanse and its hard as before. Maybe SO can comment as he\'s had the most dramatic change (saw pics on thurnders, but can\'t find his stats).

Herbert West wrote: Also, what\'s your thoughts on how much cc\'s (in average) is necessary to gain 4 cm (from 11 cm to 15 cm)?

Depends on your health, age, DNA and so on. Average 3-4 sessions to get about 4 cm (about 1.5 Inch)