Bond007 wrote: As I see a lot of the complaints against Dr Elist was from more than 3 or 4 years ago, so possibly has his technique or s improves since then and lesss complications are now occurring?
Can you expand on \"s
and technique\" to improve a fundamentally, medically, and scientifically a bad procedure that has proven to be a failure for 99.9% of victims who reported on this site alone? Of course he will claim \"improvements\" and I know there are some, but the end results have consistently been the same.
There is one report of no issues with infection and implant breakage, so far since no
Removal has occurred, (and I wish them good luck) , Aero64.
Just asking, no judgement made on your assessment.... ?