jogift wrote: I thought I already had the answers of my research and was trying to decide whether I\'d go the way of hoddle and hunky or the way of Dexter and Ultimate. But recently, the post in this thread by Lexus re-confirmed the futility of my thoughts about length. Thus I have shortened my 18 months stretching program to a year (ends February). Again, (though I don\'t quite know how to take Girth measurements - example, tightly or loosely?) I\'m 5.5\" Girth (tightly) and wanted an Inch gain. But the comments of Dexter and Ultimate about the feel and appearance of the \"difference\" in size have influenced my goal of gains. I thought, \"would I really need all this?\" I have always said that the parameters of research are reviewed over time. And S O, you cannot determine what causes or affects these reviews. Some have already foreborne you calling us \"senseless goons\" because we think we needed the forum but do you now want to impose a syllabus of our \"studies\" and information we seek?
I genuinely think the guys after 6\" +
Girth the entire shaft are taking risks for no reason at all. It\'s far more a physcological issue at that point rather than satisfying a woman.
If 6.5%
Girth makes you happy I guess, who am I to say otherwise but it\'s CRAZY big , honestly by real standards.
5.5\"
Girth along the entire shaft is pretty big by most standards, 5.75\" is rare and should fill any normal woman.
I think length surgery or anything like that is insane and risky. Presuming you fall into that 5-6\" in EG you\'re not small at all, and coupled with some relatively low risk
HA Girth , it\'s not an issue to women.
Women talk
Dick in length sizes when in reality you can make a woman come forever with 5\" EG if you have
Girth, no woman really wants her pelvis smashed constantly , the
Girth is vastly more important to penetrative sex.